SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Cal) 339

Y.R.Meena, Malay Kumar Basu
Commissioner Of Income-Tax – Appellant
Versus
Warren Tea Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Agarwal

JUDGMENT:

1. IN this application under Section 256(1) of the INcome-tax Art, 1961, the Tribunal has referred the following question :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and on a proper interpretation of Section 32AB, the assessee was eligible for the deduction in respect of the dividend income ?"

2. THE assessee is the owner of 13 tea gardens. All these are situated in upper Assam. THE assessee derives income from these tea gardens. In addition to that, the assessee has also received dividend income and claimed the benefit of Section 32AB of the Act on the dividend income also. That has been denied by the Assessing Officer. In appeal before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) also found that the assessee is not entitled for deduction under Section 32AB on the dividend income. In appeal before the Tribunal, it is recorded that Section 32AB(3) says what the profits of the business of an assessee for the purpose of Sub-section (1) are and according to the said sub-section, the profits shall be an amount arrived at after deducting an amount equal to the depreciation as per Section 32(1) from the profits computed as p




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top