SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Cal) 292

Mitra
State Transport Authority – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Arabinda Chatterji, D. Banerji, D.K. Seth, P.P. Mukherjee, R. Bhattacharji

Judgment

1. IN this Revisional Application the petitioners have challenged, inter alia, the order dated 26th March, 1991 passed by the president, Calcutta District Forum under the Consumers Protection Act, 1986 in C. D. F. Case No. 2045 of 1991 and also the order dated 5th April, 1991, passed by the President, State Commission, under the said Act, in SC Case NO,. 255 of 1991, inter alia, on the ground of jurisdiction of both the aforesaid tribuals in passing the respective orders.

2. THE case as made out by the petitioners in the Re visional application inter alia, is that the opposite party no. 1 lodged a complaint before the president, Calcutta District Forum under the Consumers Protection Act, 1986 giving rise to CDF Case No. 2045 of 1991 inter alia, for the following reliefs : -

(a) To pass an order directing the writ petitioners to show case as to why they should not be directed to grant permit to the opposite party No. 1 on the route - Calcutta to Jalpaiguri via. Barasat, Beharanpur, (Malda, Raignj and Siliguri, having Long Route Conductor licence), under Section 30 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988;

(b) After hearing both the parties to direct the writ petit Loners to grant permi














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top