SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Cal) 9

Bhagabati Prasad Banerjee
Syed Fateyab Ali Meerza – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
F. Islam, P.K. Das, S.C. Karar, S.M. Habibullah, S. Mishra

Judgment

1. THIS writ application is at the instance of the petitioner who is one of the male descendants of His Highness Fureeddon Jah Syed Mansoor Ali Khan, the Nawab of Murshidabad against an order or requisition by which the front portion of premises No. 85, Park Street, (Culcutta, which is the lawn was requisitioned under the provisions of West Bengal Land (Requisition and acquisition) Act 1948.

2. IT is not necessary to set out all the facts pleaded in the writ application. For the purpose of this writ application, the relevant facts are that Murshidabad Estate (Trust) Act 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the Trust Act) was passed by the State Legislature whereby all properties of Murshidabad Estate vested in the Trustee (Official Trustee of Government of West Bengal) and the said Trustee was under the obligation to hold properties in trust for the benefit of the sons and daughters of the Late Nawab Bahadur i. e. Syed Wasif Ali Meerza. In accordance with the provisions of the said Trust Act, premises No. 85, Park Street which forms part of the Murshidabad Estate was to be used and occupied solely by the successor of Nawab of Murshidabad. It may be mentioned that at present the




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top