SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Cal) 73

B.N.BANERJEE, K.L.ROY
Electro House – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
G.S. Khettry, B.L. Pal

JUDGMENT

BANERJEE, J.

1. THIS reference, under s. 66(1) of the Indian IT Act, 1922, has been made in circumstances hereinafter related.

2. THE assessment years, which are involved in this reference, are 1959- 60 and 1960-61, corresponding to accounting years ended on December 31, 1958, and December 31, 1959.

In or about August, 1949, one Baidyanath Gorai commenced business as an electrical contractor, under the trade name of M/s Electro House. Up to the asst. yr. 1958-59, he was assessed as the sole proprietor of the business. On January 2, 1958, a deed purporting to convert the said business into a partnership came into existence between Baidyanath Gorai, his mother-in- law, Srimati Gouribala Dasi, and his son-in-law, Nemaichand Saha. According to the deed, the three partners were given the following shares in the partnership :

3. THE ITO accorded registration to the firm, under section 26A, for the successive two assessment years under appeal. THE CIT of Income-tax, West Bengal, Calcutta, however, found on examination of the records that the orders of the ITO granting registration to the firm for the asst. yr. 1959-60 and the renewal of registration for the asst. yr. 1960-61 were




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top