SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Cal) 189

BANERJEE, K.L.ROY
Commissioner Of Wealth Tax – Appellant
Versus
Jhagrakhand Collieries (P) Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.Pal, D.Sen, D.Pal

JUDGMENT

BANERJEE, J.

1. This is a reference under s. 27(1) of the WT Act, 1957.

2. The statement of case related to two asst. yrs.1957-58 and 1959-60, corresponding valuation dates being 31st Dec., 1956 and 31st Dec., 1958.

The assessee is a company doing coal-mining business. In making a return of its net wealth as on the two valuation dates hereinbefore mentioned, the assessee claimed deduction of a sum of Rs. 28,37,282-8-0, representing taxes, penalties, etc., assessed and demanded in the year 1952. It is not disputed that certificates, under the Public Demands Recovery Act, have been issued for recovery of the said amount of Rs. 28,37,282-8-0 and it is not also disputed that notice under s. 7 of the Public Demands Recovery Act, 1913, was served on the assessee and that recovery proceedings were pending on the relevant valuation dates.

3. The WTO disallowed the assessee's claim for deduction of the said amount from the net wealth. An appeal preferred by the assessee, against the assessment order, before the AAC also failed. Thereafter, the assessee, appealed before the Tribunal, which allowed the claim of the assessee in respect of the sum of Rs. 28,37,282, with the following ob






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top