SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Cal) 774

PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
Societe Dos Products Nestle, S. A. – Appellant
Versus
"Kit-Kat" Food Product – Respondent


Judgment

P.K. Ghose, J.

The petitioner has filed this application inter alia for an injunction restraining the defendant Nos. 1, 2 and 3 from carrying on business in the name and style of Kitkat Food Products or in any other name or style bearing the words "KIT KAT" or in any name or style bearing any word or words either deceptively similar to or identical therewith and further order of injunction be made restraining the defendant Nos. 1, 2 and 3 either by themselves, or through their men, servants or agents from either manufacturing or marketing any product including confectionery items, chocolate, cereals, preparations made from cereals and snacks under the brand name "KIT KAT" and further to disclose particulars of all sales made by them of products under the brand name "KIT KAT".

Facts of the case briefly are as follows:-

2. The petitioner No.1 is the registered owner of the trade mark and trade name "KITKAT". According to the petitioner, the said trade mark and trade name is as such the executive property of the petitioner No. 1. The petitioner No.2 is the licencee of the said trade mark and in India.

3. According to the petitioner, the defendant No.1 is carrying on business in a


































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top