Nikhil Nath Bhattacharjee
Pradip Chandra – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
This revisional application under s. 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against an order dated 15.7.91 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Birbhum, in Sessions case No. 85 of 1989 arising under s. 498A, 306/304 of the Indian Penal Code. By the said order, the learned Sessions Judge rejected the application of the accused persons filed on 6th June, 1990 before him praying leave of the Court to file some documents, namely letters exchanged between the family of the accused petitioners and the family of the parents of the deceased as per Annexure to the petition. In the said application the accused/petitioners prayed that the learned Judge should ask the prosecution to admit or deny genuineness of those letters as per provision under s. 294 Cr.P.C. It was urged before him on behalf of the accused/petitioners that s. 294 Cr.P.C. was applicable at any stage of an inquiry, trial or other proceeding and if the genuineness of the letters was not disputed, to consider the said letters along with the materials and documents as may be produced by the prosecution at the time of consideration of framing of charge.
2. The learned Sessions Judge by his impugned order cons
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.