IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Baboo Lall Jain, J.
Miss Sanaka Das - Petitioner
Versus
State of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondents
Matter No. 4184 of 1991
Decided on : July 28, 1993
EDUCATION LAW - SUSPENSION OF HEADMISTRESS - VALIDITY OF RESOLUTION - INTERPRETATION OF RULE 21 OF THE RULES FOR MANAGEMENT OF RECOGNISED NON-GOVT. INSTITUTIONS (AIDED AND UNAIDED), 1969 - SCOPE OF AGENDA - CONSENT OF THREE-FOURTHS OF MEMBERS PRESENT - LOCUS STANDI OF HEADMISTRESS TO CHALLENGE RESOLUTION.
Fact of the Case:
The Headmistress of Sir Ramesh Mitra Girls School, Miss Sanaka Das, challenged a resolution passed by the Managing Committee of the school suspending her from service. The resolution was passed in a meeting held on 20th December, 1991, after considering various reports of a sub-committee formed in an earlier meeting and the Headmistress's letters to the Secretary and the office orders of the Secretary to the Headmistress. The Headmistress contended that the resolution was invalid as the agenda of the meeting was not drawn up in consultation with her, as required by Rule 21 of the Rules for Management of Recognised Non-Govt. Institutions (Aided and Unaided), 1969.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Headmistress had not cooperated with the Managing Committee and had refused to carry out its directives. The court held that the Managing Committee was well within its rights to adopt the resolutions suspending the Headmistress and empowering Smt. Sukla Basu as Teacher-in-Charge.
Issues: 1. Whether the resolution passed by the Managing Committee suspending the Headmistress was valid. 2. Whether the Headmistress had the locus standi to challenge the resolution.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the agenda of the meeting was sufficiently broad to include the suspension of the Headmistress, as it related to the deadlock condition of the school owing to the non-compliance of the Managing Committee's decisions. The court also held that even if the order of suspension was not included in the agenda, the Managing Committee could have taken it up with the consent of three-fourths of the members present, as per Rule 21. 2. The court held that the Headmistress had the locus standi to challenge the resolution as she had a legitimate interest in protecting her rights as an employee of the school.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition and vacated all interim orders obtained by the Headmistress. The court also directed the Special Officer appointed by the court during the interim proceedings to make over the charge to the Secretary of the School and stand discharged.
This writ petition was made by Miss. Sanaka Das challenging the resolution dated 20th December, 1991 perported to be passed by the Managing Committee of Sir Ramesh Mitra Girls School. In a meeting held on 20th December, 1991, it was, inter alia, resolved, that suitable disciplinary action against the Headmistress is to be taken immediately. It was also resolved by the Managing Committee that the Headmistress, Miss Sanaka Das, is suspended from her services with immediate effect. Miss Sanaka Das shall be paid subsistence allowances as admissible under the Rule.
2. The case of the petitioner is that the said resolution passed in the meeting of the Managing Committee held on 20th December, 1991 had been served upon the petitioner on 21st December, 1991. The writ petition was thereafter moved by Sanaka Das on 25th December, 1991 and on the said petition being moved an interim order was passed by this Court on 25th December, 1991 in terms of prayers (g) and (h) of the writ petition. By the said interim order a stay of the decision to place the petitioner under suspension from her service was granted and the respondents were restrained from interfering with the functioning of the petitioner as Headmistress of the said school.
3. Some of the facts relating to this case are as follows. A notice was issued by the Secretary of the said school dated 11th December, 1991 stating that a meeting of the Managing Committee of the said school will be held on 20th December, 1991 at 6.30 P. M. in the school premises. The agenda No. 3 of the said notice was to consider the various reports of the sub-committee formed in the last meeting and agenda No.5 was to consider the letter dated 12th November. 1991 and of other dates of the Headmistress addressed to the Secretary and the office orders dated 5th December, 1991 and 4th December, 1991 of the Secretary to the Headmistress and to take necessary steps to remove the deadlock condition of the school owing to the non-compliance of various decisions taken in the resolution of the Managing Committee dated 5th October, 1991.
4. Prior to that a meeting of the Managing Committee was held on 5th October, 1991. A copy of the minutes of the said meeting is annexed to the Affidavit-in-Opposition affirmed by Parimal Kumar Chowdhury on 31st January, 1992. While dealing with the Agenda No.3, the Managing Committee after considering various letters of the Secretary to the Headmistress was of the opinion that the Headmistress is deliberately avoiding the fixing up of the Audit Programme for the years 1988-89 and 1989-90 on the false allegations that the Secretary has taken away all the books and accounts. It was also resolved that the Headmistress is directed to fix up the Audit Programme immediately after the puja vacation with intimation to the Secretary. Regarding the change of signatory of Account No. 2027 in United Bank of India as per resolution dated 28th July, 1990 by the letters dated 5th November 1990, 13th November, 1990, 19th November, 1990 and 26th September, 1991, the Secretary requested the Headmistress to do the needful. The Managing Committee found that the Headmistress was deliberately ignoring to comply with the resolution dated 28th July, 1990 of the managing committee. It was also resolved that the Headmistress is directed to do the needful so as to change the signatories of the Account No. 2027 on or before 11th October, 1991. It was further resolved that the Headmistress if directed to call the meeting of the Finance Sub-Committee on 16th November, 1991 to discuss the financial position of the school. It was also resolved that the Managing Committee had the opinion that the Headmistress was ignoring to act according to the directives of the Managing Committee in respect of filling up of the vacant posts in the school and the Headmistress was directed to do the needful to fill up the vacant posts as early as possible. The minutes of the said meeting clearly demonstrate that the Headmis
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.