PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY, SAMAPTI CHATTERJEE
Souvik Mukherjee – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J.
The appellant herein has preferred the instant appeal assailing the judgment and order dated 18th November, 2013 passed by the learned Single Judge and also filed an application for stay. Both the appeal and the connected application have now been listed for hearing.
Going through the records, we find that the Public Service Commission, West Bengal issued an advertisement being Advertisement No. 02/2013 for holding the West Bengal Judicial Service Examination, 2013. The appellant/petitioner herein submitted an application in the prescribed format in response to the aforesaid advertisement.
In the said application form, the appellant petitioner disclosed that he was in full time engagement in a law firm as an associate. In view of the aforesaid disclosure, respondent Public Service Commission refused to treat the appellant as an eligible candidate for participating in the West Bengal Judicial Service Examination, 2013 and therefore refused to issue the admit card to the said appellant/petitioner. The appellant/petitioner thereafter submitted a representation to the Chairperson, Public Service Commission referring to Rule 49 of the Bar Council of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.