SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

NADIRA PATHERYA, INDRAJIT CHATTERJEE
Bimal Kr. Mondal – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Ayan Bhattacharyya, Advocate.
For the State :Ranabir Roychowdhury, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Nadira Patherya, J.

1. This appeal is directed against the order and judgment dated 29th September, 1997 passed by the Assistant Sessions Judge, 1st Court Contai convicting the accused appellant herein under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code to suffer rigorous imprisonment for eight years and to pay fine of Rs. 3,000/-. In default, to suffer S. I. for a further period of two months.

2. The facts of the instant case is as follows:

The accused appellant along with eight other accused persons armed with deadly weapons trespassed into the dwelling house of the defacto-complainant and demolished the boundary wall of the said dwelling house. On being resisted by P.W.6, the accused appellant inflicted a knife injury on the left chest of the defacto-complainant's husband, Dhiren Mondal (P.W.6). The accused persons also took away a trunk from their house containing cash and gold earring. An FIR was filed by the defacto-complainant on 31st August, 1994, being Egra P.S. Case No.86/94 and on basis of such complaint, investigation was initiated. As a result of such investigation, the accused person along with eight other persons were arrested on 17th November, 1995. The investigation
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top