T.S.THAKUR, R.BANUMATHI
Nar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R. BANUMATHI, J.
Leave granted.
2. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 30.08.2012 passed in Crl. Appeal D-960-DB/2006 by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissing the appeal of accused-appellant thereby confirming the conviction of the appellant under Section 302, IPC and sentence of rigorous imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.20,000/-with default clause and conviction under Section 25 (1B) of the Arms Act, 1959 and sentence of rigorous imprisonment for three years and a fine of Rs.10,000/-with default clause as imposed by the trial court.
3. Briefly stated, case of the prosecution is that on 6.03.2005, Rajbir went to sleep in the street on a cot at about 7.30 p.m. and Daya Nand (PW-7) also went to sleep in his house at about 9.00 p.m. At 11.00 P.M., Daya Nand heard the sound of vomiting of his brother and he came out and found his brother Rajbir crying in pain. PW-7 called his father Chander Bhan and both of them noticed injuries on the forehead of Rajbir with profuse bleeding. PW-7 went to call the doctor but the doctor refused to accompany him. When Daya Nand returned back, Rajbir had already succumbed to injuries. Law was set in motion by PW-7
Usha K. Pillai v. Raj K. Srinivas
Paramjeet Singh alias Pamma v. State of Uttarakhand
Sharad Birdichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra
State of Maharashtra v. Sukhdev Singh
Basava R. Patil v. State of Karnataka
Avtar Singh v. State of Punjab
Wasim Khan v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
Bhoor Singh v. State of Punjab
Santosh Kumar Singh v State through CBI
Alister Anthony Pareira v. State of Maharashtra
Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade v. State of Maharashtra
State (Delhi Administration) v. Dharampal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.