MANJULA CHELLUR, ARIJIT BANERJEE
National Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Sujit Kumar Banerjee – Respondent
Arijit Banerjee, J.
1. The abovementioned appeals arise out of two separate judgments and orders, both dated 2 December, 2014, passed by the Learned Single Judge in WP No. 304 of 2009 and WP No. 999 of 2009. However, since the said two writ petitions arise out of the same set of facts, the two appeals have been taken up together for hearing and disposal by this common Judgment.
Re: APO 523 of 2014 (Arising out of 304 of 2009)
2. The respondent is admittedly an agent of the appellant National Insurance Co. Ltd. (in short ‘NICL’). The respondent claimed agency commission from NICL for procuring insurance business for the Company. Admittedly, the respondent acted as a liaison in the capacity of an agent in respect of two insurance policies taken by the Kolkata Police from NICL. The policies are the Group Personal Medi-Claim Policy (in short ‘Mediclaim Policy’) and the Group Personal Accident Policy (in short ‘Accident Policy’). The policies are for the benefit of the persons in the employment of the Kolkata Police. The claim of the respondent is on account of agency commission in connection with the mediclaim policy. On the refusal of NICL to pay the claimed amount, the respond
Suganmal vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Provash Chandra Dalui vs. Biswanath Banerjee
Biman Krishna Bose vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
ABL International Ltd. vs. Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd.
Gunwant Kaur vs. Municipal Committee, Bhatinda
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.