N.RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR, J.C.SHAH, K.C.DAS GUPTA, P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAR, K.N.WANCHOO
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Appellant
Versus
BHAILAL BHAI – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE 31 appeals by the State of Madhya Pradesh are against the orders made by the High court of Madhya Pradesh in 31 applications under Art. 226 of the Constitution by dealers in tobacco. All these petitioners carried on business in Madhya Bharat which later became part of the State of Madhya Pradesh. They were assessed to sales tax on their sales of tobacco in accordance with the notification issued by the State government in exercise of powers under s. 5 of the State Sales Tax Act and large amounts were collected by the Madhya Bharat government and later by the Madhya Pradesh government. The petitioners contended that the taxing provisions under which the tax was assessed and collected from them was unconstitutional as it infringed Art. 301 of the Constitution and did not come within the special provision of Art. 304 (a ). Accordingly, they prayed for appropriate writs or orders for refund of all the taxes that has been collected from them. In resisting these applications the Madhya Pradesh government contended, first, that the Wing provisions did not offend Art. 301 of the Constitution and that in any case, they satisfied the requirements of Art. 304 (
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.