ARIJIT BANERJEE
Pradip Kumar Ray Chaudhuri – Appellant
Versus
Kolkata Municipal Corporation – Respondent
Arijit Banerjee, J.
1. The petitioner is a Medical Officer at the Health Department of the respondent corporation. In this proceeding he challenges an order dated 12 December, 2013 passed by the Appellate Authority in connection with a departmental case initiated against the petitioner by issuance of charge sheet dated 19 December, 2007.
2. The charges levelled against the petitioner were that he was found to be absent from office frequently without prior intimation and even when he was in office, he was rarely found in his chair; he had the habit of sending the visitors to the higher authority unnecessarily to avoid his own responsibilities causing much harassment to the public as well as wastage of time of his superior officers; insubordination and conduct improper and unbecoming of a Corporation employee.
3. A departmental proceeding was held and the enquiry officer in his report dated 20 May, 2010 held the charges to have been established beyond any reasonable doubt.
4. The Disciplinary Authority being the Municipal Commissioner considered the representation of the petitioner in respect of the enquiry officer’s report and passed a reasoned order dated 11 January, 2011 acc
Ram Chander vs. Union of India
S.N. Mukherjee vs. Union of India reported in (1990) 4 SCC 594
Madhya Pradesh Industries Ltd. vs. Union of India
Siemens Engineering & Manufacturing Co. Ltd. vs. Union of India
Chairman, Disciplinary Authority, Rani Lakshmi Bai Kshetriya Gramin Bank Vs. Jagdish Sharan Varshney
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.