DIPANKAR DATTA
Communist Party of India (Marxist) – Appellant
Versus
United Bank of India – Respondent
1. Although the dispute that this Bench is called upon to examine is between a political party on the one hand and a nationalized bank on the other, the basic question that would engage the attention of this Bench is, whether the wish of a person, who is no longer alive in this mortal world, should be allowed to prevail over a technical objection.
2. The aforesaid question emerges in view of the facts narrated hereafter.
3. Tushar Kanti Das Purakayastha (since deceased), during his lifetime, maintained a savings bank account (hereafter the said account) with the Syed Amir Ali Avenue Branch (hereafter the said branch) of the United Bank of India (hereafter UBI). Being a member of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) [hereafter the petitioner], late Tushar Kanti Das Purakayastha [hereafter the customer] had nominated the Secretary, Kolkata District Committee of the petitioner to whom the amount lying in deposit in such account may be returned by the said branch in the event of his death. After his death on January 20, 2014, the petitioner by its letter dated February
Banarasi Dass v. Wealth Tax Officer, Spl. Circle, Meerut
Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras & anr. v. S.V. Angidi Chettair
Ghulam Qadir Wagay v. State & ors.
Kanyakaparameswari Varthaka Sangham v. Commissioner of Endowments, Andhra Pradesh
Y. Narayana Chetty & anr. v. The Income Tax Officer, Nellore & ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.