SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Cal) 269

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CALCUTTA
I.P. MUKERJI, J.
Sikaria Divinity Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
A.P. No. 543 of 2017 (Original Side)
Decided on : 18-08-2017

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Surojit Nath Mitra, Shyamal Sarkar, Sr. Advocates, Arindam Mukherjee, Swarvanu Saha, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Jishnu Chowdhury, Addl. Govt. Pleader, Paritosh Sinha, Arindam Mondal Advocates.

The court found that the contract was capable of being specifically performed, and the termination was wrongful and illegal. It restrained the respondent from terminating the contract and directed them to co-operate with the petitioner.

Headnote:

Specific Relief Act - Contract for Ecotourism Resort - Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Prima facie, the petitioner is in firm possession of the island for 32 years, renewable for another 32 years. The termination of the contract on 11th July, 2017 was wrongful and illegal. The respondent is restrained by an order of injunction from terminating the contract till 7th September, 2017 and for a further period of 45 days thereafter. The contract can only be terminated for any alleged breach of the petitioner after the date of this order. The petitioner will be entitled to resume the work forthwith. The respondent is directed to co-operate with the petitioner. The Principal Secretary Tourism Department is directed to ensure that the officers under him do not misuse their power in dealing with this contract.

Fact of the Case:

The Department of Tourism, Government of West Bengal entered into a concession agreement with the petitioner for the development of an ecotourism resort on an island in the river Hooghly. The petitioner was accused of defaulting on the project, leading to a termination notice. The petitioner filed an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking an injunction restraining the respondent from interfering with their rights under the agreement and staying the operation of the show cause notice.

Finding of the Court:

Prima facie, the termination of the contract was wrongful and illegal. The court found that the petitioner was in firm possession of the island and had been performing the work in accordance with the pace expected under the agreement. The court restrained the respondent from terminating the contract and directed them to co-operate with the petitioner. The Principal Secretary Tourism Department was directed to ensure that the officers under him do not misuse their power in dealing with the contract.

Issues: The main issues revolved around the alleged default by the petitioner, the wrongful termination of the contract, and the appropriateness of granting an injunction.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the petitioner had a substantial interest in the contract and that compensation in money would not be an adequate relief. It held that the contract was capable of being specifically performed and that the termination was wrongful and illegal. The court restrained the respondent from terminating the contract and directed them to co-operate with the petitioner.

Final Decision: The termination notice dated 11th July, 2017 was set aside. The petitioner was granted time to complete the work and the respondent was restrained from terminating the contract. The petitioner was entitled to resume the work and the respondent was directed to co-operate with them. The Principal Secretary Tourism Department was directed to ensure that the officers under him do not misuse their power in dealing with the contract.

JUDGMENT :

1. The river Hooghly, while flowing down the plains of Bengal towards the sea, has branched out, upstream of Chuchura in the Hooghly District, to form a beautiful island in the middle of the river, measuring about 75 acres. It is called “Sabuj Dweep”. It has trees and plants of many kinds and recreational facilities which attract thousands of tourists over the year. The land belongs to the Department of Tourism, Government of West Bengal. This department conceived of the idea of developing the island into a ecotourism resort. On 14th August, 2015 it entered into a contract with the petitioner which was described as a “concession agreement”. The petitioner was entrusted with the construction and development of a “project”, according to the plans, designs and project report prepared by the respondent, taking all the approvals, permits etc. and by complying with the laws so as to ensure “bio-diversity”. It was for 32 years to be renewed for a further period of 32 years. The petitioner was required to make an initial payment of Rs. 70 lakhs followed by an annual fee.

2. This application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been made further to an arbitration clause in the agreement. The petition is in two volumes. All the papers that would have been necessary to dispose of the Section 9 application are included in the petition. Extensive arguments have been made. I propose to dispose of this application, on these papers without inviting affidavits. It goes without saying that the allegations made in the petition, are denied by the respondent.

3. We have to take our starting point as 8th March, 2017. On that day the Principal Secretary Tourism Department wrote to the Managing Director of the petitioner telling him that his government had invested more than Rs. 9 crores in the project. They had set up the jetty, built roads made available drinking water and power supply to the island. It blamed the petitioner for not starting the work on time and for the delay in proceeding with it. What is most important is that the Principal Secretary granted the petitioner six months’ time to complete some “pin pointed few basic components” of the project, mentioned in the annexure to the letter. In this annexure the following works were specified:

“1. The entire place has to be divided into 2 segments (i) Picnic spot on the right side (ii) Cottage on the left side

2. Two/Three common wash room. 3. 20 double bedded room with a dormitory facility separately. 4. Food court for bit high end in segment-(ii) & day to day food court in segment—(i) 5. Two watch towers 6. Proper landscaping 7. Display of local hand crafts with artisans. 8. Swimming pool for segment—(ii) 9. Games for both side.10. New vessel for carry vehicles with jetty in segment—(ii) 11. Path way. 12. Generator facility. 13. Signage on high way 14. Cultural activities area. 15. Parking place for vehicle arriving in island in segment—(ii). 15. Eco friendly vehicle for access to cottage from jetty in segment—(ii) 16. Battery operated car for joy rode. 17. CCTV.”

4. The petitioner replied to this letter on 12th April, 2017 by expressing their commitment to finish the seventeen items mentioned in the above annexure by 31st August, 2017. They added that they had started the construction of double bedded wooden cottages. They also said that an item wise schedule was attached to the letter but I do not find any such schedule. On 29th May, 2017 the petitioner reported to the Secretary of the Tourism Department that the work was progressing in accordance with the schedule submitted on 12th April, 2017. This time a progress chart was attached to the letter. According to this chart construction of two jetties on the main island, improvement of 1.5 kilometres of PWD road from Somra Bazar Station, Sukhriya Ghat at Hooghly were completed. Some other works were shown to be partly completed.

5. Suddenly on 8th June, 2017 a show cause notice was issued by the Director o

















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top