DEBASISH KAR GUPTA, MD.MUMTAZ KHAN
Dibakar Mondal – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
Md. Mumtaz Khan, J.
1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant assailing the judgment, order of conviction and sentence dated September 17, 1993 passed by the Ld. Sessions Judge, Birbhum in Sessions Trial No. 2 of July, 1993 arising out of Sessions Case No. 65 of 1990. By virtue of the impugned judgment appellant was convicted for the commissioning of the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as I.P.C.) and was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 5,000/- in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year more with a direction that the fine, if realized, be paid to the heirs of the deceased, Panchanan Mondal.
2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that one Haripada Mondal had some landed properties as well as dwelling house at Baliharpur under Md. Bazar P.S. Dist. Birbhum. He had seven sons named Panchanan Mondal, the victim, Dasarath Mondal, since deceased, Provakar Mondal, Dibakar Mondal, the appellant, Nishakar Mondal, P.W.1, Dilip Mondal and Mihir Mondal. After death of Haripada Mondal there was salish in the village and as per the salish the said dwelling house was allotted to
Dayal Singh and ors. Vs. State of Uttaranchal
Jitender Kumar Vs. State of Haryana
Karnel Singh vs. State of M.P.
Leela Ram vs. State of Haryana
Mahavir Singh Vs.State of Madhya Pradesh
Shyamal Ghosh vs. State of West Bengal, (2012) 7 SCC 646
State of Punjab Vs. Rajinder Singh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.