ASHA ARORA
Manju Dutta – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
1. A girl of tender age was sexually abused by a depraved man in an incident which occurred on 2nd August, 1994 in the precinct of Bangur Institute of Neurology.
2. Keeping in mind the object of preventing social victimisation or ostracism of a victim of sexual offence for which section 228A of the Indian Penal Code has been enacted stating that the name of such a victim shall not be indicated in the judgment, I think it appropriate to refer to her as ‘the victim’.
3. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 29th March, 1995 and 30th March, 1995 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge 9th Court Alipore in Sessions Trial No. 1(2) 1995 convicting the accused Subal Chandra Dutta for the offence punishable under section 376/511 of the IPC and sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 250/- in default of which to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a further period of fifteen days for the aforesaid offence.
4. Bereft of unnecessary details, the case of the prosecution as narrated by the victim in her First Information Statement dated 2nd August, 1994 (exhibit 1/1) is as follows:
On 2nd August, 1994
K. Venkateshwarlu Versus State of Andhra Pradesh reported in (2012)8 SCC 73
Shivasharanappa and Others Versus State of Karnataka reported in (2013)5 SCC 705
Rana Partap Versus State of Haryana reported in (1983)3 SCC 327
Tomaso Bruno and another Versus State of Uttar Pradesh reported in (2015)7 SCC 178
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.