SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Cal) 943

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
JOYMALYA BAGCHI, RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, JJ.
Bablu Sardar and Ors - Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal - Respondent
C.R.A. No. 188 of 1994
Decided On : 08-12-2017

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sekhar Kumar Basu, Sr. Adv., Kallol Mondal, Adv., Krishan Ray and Amrita Chel
For the Respondent: Neguive Ahmed and Kakali Chatterjee

The court upheld the conviction of the appellants under sections 302/149/148/448/149 of Indian Penal Code, finding the evidence of the wife of the deceased to be vital and reliable, corroborated by other witnesses.

Headnote:

Joya Sardar - Conviction under sections 302/149/148/448/149 of Indian Penal Code - Summary: The prosecution case involved an attack on the victim and his family by a group of individuals armed with bombs and other deadly weapons. The victim sustained fatal injuries and died at the spot. The trial court convicted the appellants under sections 302/149/148/448/149 of Indian Penal Code. The defense argued that the evidence was unreliable and suffered from contradictions and infirmities. The State contended that the eyewitness testimony was trustworthy and reliable, supported by medical evidence and corroborated by post-occurrence witnesses. The court found the evidence of the wife of the deceased to be vital and reliable, corroborated by other witnesses. The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction of the appellants. The court also set off the period of detention suffered by the appellants during investigation, enquiry, and trial from the substantive sentence imposed upon them.

JUDGMENT :

JOYMALYA BAGCHI, J.

1. The appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 29.6.1994 and 30.6.1994 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, 1st Fast Court, Alipore, South 24 Parganas, in Sessions Trial No. 3(6) of 1993 corresponding to Sessions Case No. 79(4) of 1993 convicting the appellants herein for the commission of offence punishable under sections 302/149/148/448/149 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 300/- in default to further rigorous imprisonment for one year more for the offence under sections 302/149 of Indian Penal Code, rigorous imprisonment for two years for the offence punishable under section 148 of Indian Penal Code and rigorous imprisonment for one year for the offence under sections 448/149 of Indian Penal Code, all the sentences to run concurrently. Prosecution case, as alleged, against the appellants is to the effect that on 2.4.1987 at about 12.00-12.30 p.m. the victim Joya Sardar along with his wife Sumitra @ Chali Sardar (P.W. 1) was in their house. His brother Gagan (P.W. 2) and his wife were also in their house adjoining that of Joya Sardar. At that time the appellant along with others being armed with bombs and other deadly weapons proceeded towards the house of Gagan. Some of them called Gagan from his house and enquired why he was not attending the meeting. Gagan told them that the meeting did not relate to his affairs whereupon Narbindo Sardar (Accused No. 13) threw a bomb at Gagan. Gagan turned aside and the bomb hit the wall and exploded. Gagan suffered burn injuries on his hands and chest. Gagan ran away along the narrow passage between his house and that of elder brother, Adhir Sardar. On his way he met a green coconut seller and requested him to take him to the police station where he lodged a general diary. On hearing the sound of explosion, Joya Sardar, the victim, came to the spot and proceeded through the passage between his house and that of his brother, Gagan. At that time Joya asked the appellants, namely, Pora Bablu, Nidhiram and others about the incident. Sumitra (P.W. 1), wife of Joya was also standing in the courtyard at that time. The appellant Pora Bablu abused Joya and threw a bomb at him. As a result he sustained bomb injuries on his right leg. Sumitra came to the rescue of her husband. Her husband told her that Pora Bablu had hurled bomb at him. Then Joya Sardar started crawling towards his house and the appellant Nidhiram Sardar attempted to fire at him from a pipegun. Sumitra asked appellant Nidhiram not to do so. Thereupon, Nidhiram held her by her wearing apparel and hit her with the pipe gun. At that moment, the appellant Tarak Sardar was found standing with a bomb in front of Joya's room. The appellant Tarak hurled bomb at Joya and also abused him. Sumitra asked Tarak not to do so. Sumitra took Joya into their room and closed the door and windows of the room. Then the miscreant appellant's hurled bombs at the door and windows of their house and left. After some time they returned and tried to break the door and windows of the house of Joya. Then they again left the spot saying that they were going to the house of Basu. After 8-10 minutes later, the miscreants came back and broke the door of the verandah of Joya's house with an axe. Then the appellants hit the inner door with the axe and entered the room of Joya. Joya and Sumitra took refuge under a cot in order to conceal themselves. The appellant Lamba Bablu @ Bablu Pramanik struck Joya with an axe. The appellant Kalua hit Joya with a sword on his cheek. The appellants dragged Sumitra from beneath the cot. When Sumitra embraced her husband the appellants abused her. Pora Bablu and Nidhiram tried to take her away. The appellant, Tarak fired at Joya with his pipe gun. Thereafter, the miscreants left the place and Joya died at the spot. Police reached the place of occurrence and recorded the statement of Sumitra Sardar which












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top