SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Cal) 2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
SAMAPTI CHATTERJEE, J.
JHUMA HATUI - Appellant
Vs.
STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 3604 of 2018
Decided on : 21-02-2019

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Sukanta Chakraborty, Adv., Sakabda Roy, Adv., Ratul Biswas, Adv., Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya, Adv., Suman Dey, Adv.

The court emphasized the importance of fair evaluation and rectification of alleged incorrect key answers and wrong assessment of OMR sheet to ensure eligibility for the petitioners.

Headnote:

Key Answers - Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) 2014 - Section 1, Section 3 - [Section 1: Question 9, 22, 25; Section 3: Question 78] - The court directed the Vice Chancellor of Visva Bharati University to appoint experts to examine the correctness of the key answers, and upon receiving the expert reports, directed the West Bengal Board of Primary Education to award marks to the petitioners who attempted the wrong question/options in the key answers of JGB question booklet series. The Secretary was further directed to take steps to give appointment to the petitioners if found eligible, within three months from the date of judgment.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a TET 2014 candidate, filed a writ petition seeking reassessment of OMR sheet and awarding full marks for specific questions. The petitioner alleged incorrect key answers and wrong assessment of OMR sheet, resulting in her failure to qualify for the TET examination.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the Vice Chancellor to appoint experts to examine the correctness of the key answers and, upon receiving the expert reports, directed the West Bengal Board of Primary Education to award marks to the petitioners who attempted the wrong question/options in the key answers of JGB question booklet series. The Secretary was further directed to take steps to give appointment to the petitioners if found eligible, within three months from the date of judgment.

Issues: Reassessment of OMR sheet, awarding full marks for specific questions, appointment as trained candidate for the post of Assistant Teacher, and transmission of entire original records before the court.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the need to rectify the alleged incorrect key answers and wrong assessment of OMR sheet, ensuring fair evaluation and eligibility for the petitioners.

Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and the Secretary of the West Bengal Board of Primary Education was directed to award marks to the petitioners and take steps for their appointment if found eligible, within three months from the date of judgment.

JUDGMENT :

Samapti Chatterjee, J.

This Court has already decided the above-mentioned issues in the judgment delivered on 27th July, 2018 in W.P No.23006 (W) of 2017 and others. In the said matter this Court initially on passed an interim order thereby appointing the Vice Chancellor of Visva Bharati to examine correctness of the 11 numbers of question of JGB Question Booklet series by the experts and filed the report of the expert to that effect.

2. Accordingly, this Court in the order dated 27th July, 2018 directed the Vice Chancellor of Visva Bharati University to appoint expert in the relevant subject for examining the correctness of the key answers which will be binding upon all parties as agreed by the parties.

3. Since the petitioner has filed the present writ petition prior to the interim order dated 27th July 2018, therefore, in my opinion petitioner is entitled to get order in the line of the interim order dated 27th July 2018 as well as the judgment dated 3rd October 2018, passed in the said writ petition. The interim order dated 27th July 2018, as well as judgment and order dated 3rd October 2018, is quoted below:-

“The following issues are to be determined in the present writ petition :-

(i) Whether in multiple choice of objective type test, wrong key answers supplied by the paper setter should be ascertained by external experts on the subject?

(ii) Whether candidates are entitled to be awarded with full marks for wrong key answers supplied by the paper setter ?

2. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition praying for the following reliefs :-

(a) A writ of or in the nature of Mandamus do issue commanding the respondents, their agents, servants, subordinates, employees and/or assignees to reassess and/or re-evaluate the OMR sheet of the petitioner of TET 2014 and award full marks to question no.9, 22 and 25 of Section-I, Language-I, Bengali subject and question no.78 of Section III Chile Development and Pedagogy of question booklet series no. JGB and declare the petitioner as qualified in TET 2014 and to follow consequential steps for recruitment to the post of Assistant Teacher under the concerned Primary School Council;

(b) A writ of or in the nature of mandamus do issue commanding the respondents, their agents, servants, subordinates, employees and/or assignees to appoint your petitioner as trained candidate for the post of Assistant Teacher pursuant to the selection process of 2016 under the Kolkata Primary School Council.

(c) A Writ in the nature of Certiorari commanding the Respondents to transmit and produce the entire original records before this Hon'ble Court so that conscionable justice may be administered and by granting other relief as prayed hereinabove;

(d) Issue Rule NISI in terms of prayers (a) to (c) as above

(e) A order do issue directing the Respondent Council to keep 1 post of Primary Teacher vacant under the Respondent Council till the disposal of the Writ Application.

(f) Ad interim Order in terms of the prayers (e) of this application, as above.

(g) And to pass such other or further Orders as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper.

3. Mr. Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharyya, Ld. Sr. Advocate appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an OBC-B candidate. The petitioner passed higher secondary level examination with 72.3 % marks and also completed two years diploma in elementary education. The petitioner participated in the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) 2014 held on 11th October 2015. Unfortunately the petitioner was not shown as successful in the TET examination.

It is also submitted by Mr. Bhattacharyya that immediately after declaration of result of TET 2014 the petitioner made an application under Right to Information Act, 2005 for supplying the OMR sheet question paper and key answer. Accordingly on 10th August, 2017 the Secretary of the Board supplied the question paper OMR sheet an




































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top