IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
ARIJIT BANERJEE, J.
Friends Of Tribal Society and Another - Appellant
Vs.
State Of West Bengal and Others - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 18414 of 2017
Decided on : 14-11-2018
RTE Act - Non-formal Training Centres - West Bengal Societies Registration Act, 1961 - Articles 21A and 30 of the Constitution of India - Sarthak Ghosh and Ors. vs. the State of West Bengal and Ors, (2017) 2 Cal LT 155 - The Sole Trustee, Lok Shikshana Trust vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mysore, (1976) 1 SCC 254 - State of W.B and Ors. vs. Monirujjaman Mullick & Ors., (1996) 10 SCC 56 - Bharat Singh and Ors. vs. State of Haryana and Ors., (1988) 4 SCC 534 - P.A. Inamdar & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors., (2005) 6 SCC 537 - State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. vs. Bhupendra Nath Tripathi & Ors., (2010) 13 SCC 203
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Society registered under the West Bengal Societies Registration Act, 1961, runs non-formal training centres under the name 'Ekal Vidyalayas' in tribal areas. The District Inspector of Schools issued memos directing the petitioner to close its training centres as per RTE norms. The petitioner sought quashing of the memos and a declaration that the training centres are not schools under the RTE Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the non-formal training centres run by the petitioner do not qualify as schools within the meaning of the RTE Act. The impugned memos were unreasoned and lacked evidence to support the claim that the training centres were schools. The court held that the RTE Act is designed to control the formal process of education leading to the issuance of certificates, and it was not intended to bring informal coaching centres within its purview. The court declared that the training centres do not require a certificate of recognition under the RTE Act.
Issues: The issues revolved around the classification of non-formal training centres as schools under the RTE Act, the validity of the memos issued by the District Inspector of Schools, and the obligation of the petitioner to obtain a certificate of recognition under the RTE Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the RTE Act, the lack of evidence supporting the classification of the training centres as schools, and the intention of the Act to regulate formal education leading to the issuance of certificates. The court emphasized the importance of informal education efforts and condemned the State's attempt to stifle such initiatives.
Final Decision: The court declared that the non-formal training centres run by the petitioner do not qualify as schools under the RTE Act, set aside the impugned memos, and ruled that the training centres do not require a certificate of recognition under the RTE Act. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.
ARIJIT BANERJEE, J.
1. The petitioner no. 1 is a Society registered under the West Bengal Societies Registration Act, 1961. The petitioner no. 2 professes to be an Office Bearer of the petitioner no. 1 and authorized by the governing body of the petitioner no. 1 to institute the present proceeding.
2. The petitioner no. 1 (in short the ‘Society’) contends that it runs 30, 113 numbers of Non-formal Training Centres in the tribal areas of India for the benefit of the children of tribal families. The students, who are admitted in regular schools in a particular area, come to such a centre for enriching themselves in diverse fields principally for their mental and educational development. Although these centres are called Ekal Vidyalayas, actually these are one Teacher Non-formal Coaching Centres imparting informal education and vocational training.
3. In this writ petition the petitioners pray for quashing of two memos issued by the District Inspector of Schools (P.E.) Dakshin Dinajpur. The first memo is dated 2 March, 2017. The said memo reads as follows:-
“Subject- Regarding some Private School in which the school Authority have not applied for N.O.C. to the competent Authority in terms of RTE-2009 and West Bengal Rights of Children to Free & Compulsory Education Rules-2012,
Ref. Memo No. - 107 (6) SC/P, Dated-03.02.2017
Sir/Madam,
As per direction of the Deputy Director of School Education (Rural Primary), Govt. Of West Bengal, the above mentioned School Authority is requested to attend to a Hearing with all relevant papers of the institution, to be held on 06-03-2017 at the Office of the Sub-Inspector of Schools, Tapan East Circle, Dakshin Dinajpur, from 10 AM to 4.00 P.M.”
The second memo which is dated 10 March, 2017 reads as follows:-
“Subject- Closing of your Institution as per RTE Norms-2009,
Ref. Memo No.-47(21) SC/AIS, Dated08/03/2017,
Sir/Madam,
In reference to the subject mentioned above the undersigned likes to inform you that no school shall be established or recognized under section 18 of RTE Act unless it fulfils the norms and standards specified in the RTE Act, 2009. Your institution has been inspected as per Memo No. - 17-SC/P, Dated03/01/2017 by officers (S.I./S., A.I./S.) as well as a Hearing has been conducted on 06/03/2017 as per Memo No. 107 (6) SC/P, Dated- 03-02-2017. It appears from the Hearing record that you have not applied for NOC, for getting it from the Appropriate Authority. Your school is not fit for running as per RTE Norms, 2009, so close your school as early as possible.”
The petitioners also pray for a declaration that the Non-formal Training Centres which are being run by the Society under the name and style of “Ekal Vidyalaya” are not schools within the meaning of the Rights of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (in short the ‘RTE Act’) and the Rules framed there under.
Submission of the Petitioners:-
4. Appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Mr. Anindya Kumar Mitra, learned Senior Counsel submitted that the memo dated 10 March, 2017 whereby the Society was directed to close its training centre is an unreasoned memo and on that ground alone is liable to be quashed. No reason has been given as to why the Society’s Training Centre comes under the purview of the RTE Act.
5. Mr. Mitra then submitted that the word “Education” has been used in various Articles of the Constitution of India. In particular he referred to Articles 21A and 30. Article 21A has made imparting free compulsory education to all children in the age group of six to fourteen years a constitutional duty of the State. The category of education (Academic or informal) and the manner of imparting of such education were left with the State to determine by law. To give effect to the intent and sprit of Article 21A, the Parliament has promulgated the RTE Act. The Parliament has determined that the category of edu
Bharat Singh and Ors. vs. State of Haryana and Ors.
L. Muthukumar vs. State of T.N.
P.A. Inamdar and Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Sarthak Ghosh and Ors. vs. the State of West Bengal and Others
State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. vs. Bhupendra Nath Tripathi and Ors.
State of W.B. and Ors. vs. Monirujjaman Mullick and Ors.
The Sole Trustee, Lok Shikshana Trust vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mysore
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.