SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Cal) 430

RAJASEKHAR MANTHA
Jagannath Saha @ Rinku – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Soubhik Mitter, Arushi Rathore, Rajnandini Das.
For the Respondents: Bidyut Kumar Roy, Kakali Chatterjee.

JUDGMENT :

1. The instant criminal appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction dated 28.04.2011 and 29.04.2011 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court 1, Dinhata, Coochbehar in Sessions Trial No. 5(IX)/2010 arising out of Sessions Case No. 177/2010 convicting the appellant under Sections 489B and 489C of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2. By the impugned Judgment the appellant was found guilty under Section 489B and 489C of the Penal Code and sentenced to suffer 3 years and 3 months rigorous imprisonment under Section 489B of the IPC and 3 years and 3 months under Section 489C of the IPC, to run concurrently and with fine of Rs. 3000/- and fine of Rs. 3000/- with a default clause.

3. The prosecution case in brief is that on 30.08.2009, while the PW-1, ASI Gopal Chandra Mondal, was on mobile duty, he received information from sources, that a fake currency transaction was taking place in the midnight at Sahebganj Bazar at Dinhata in Coochbehar district.

4. The said PW-1, thereupon, went to Sahebganj Bazar at Dinhata and found the appellant,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top