SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Cal) 537

ABHIJIT GANGOPADHYAY
Kalika Pathak – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Achin Kumar Majumder, Pratik Majumder, Dilip Kumar Maity, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

1. This judgment is in 8 (eight) parts.

Part: I

The writ application relates to a disciplinary proceeding initiated by the Railway Protection Force against the petitioner who in the writ application has introduced himself as an Inspector of South Eastern Railway against whom charge-sheet was issued on 10.01.2014 by the Senior Divisional Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, and South Eastern Railway Kharagpur (RPF, in short, hereafter). In the said writ application writ of mandamus was prayed for direction on the respondent authority

(i) for not giving any effect or further effect to the charge-sheet dated 10.01.2014; and

(ii) for not giving any effect to the

(a) findings of the Enquiry Officer dated 05.06.2014;

(b) the speaking order dated 18.04.2015 and 17.12.2016;

and

(c) the show cause notice dated 21.09.2017.

2. Direction for not disturbing service of the petitioner and writ of or in the nature of prohibition in respect of the above charge-sheet etc. has also been prayed.

Part: II

3. This writ application was initially heard by the writ Court on 25.10.2017. The writ Court did not interfere with the disciplinary proceedings and the writ application was dismissed as it

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top