DIPANKAR DATTA, BIBEK CHAUDHURI
State Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
Golam Jilani – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
BIBEK CHAUDHURI, J.
1. State Bank of India through its officers have challenged the judgment and order dated 10th August, 2018 passed in W.P No.34722(W) of 2013 by a learned Single Judge of this Court directing the appellants to take steps for releasing the pensionary benefit in favour of the respondent No.1 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of such judgment.
2. The respondent No.1 as writ petitioner filed W.P No.34722(W) of 2013 stating, inter alia, that he joined service in the State Bank of India, Calcutta Main Branch in the subordinate cadre on 6th August, 1979. Subsequently, he was promoted to the post of Assistant (Accounts) in the State Bank. In course of his service, he was posted in different branches of the bank and while he was working at Fort William Branch, Calcutta, he received a letter to show cause, vide letter baring No.Br.17-111 dated 22nd January, 2002 why disciplinary action would not be taken against him for certain irregularities, and/or forgery allegedly committed by him in course of his official duties. The respondent no.1 denied all the allegations levelled against him in writing on 23rd March, 2002. However, on 27th S
Arikaravula Sanyasi Raju vs. Branch Manager State Bank of India reported in (1997) 1 SCC 256
C. Jakob vs. Director of Geology and Mining reported in (2008) 10 SCC 115
State Bank of India vs. Radhe Shyam Pandey reported in (2015) 12 SCC 451
State of Himachal Pradesh and others vs. Rajesh Chander Sood and others reported in (2016) 10 SCC 77
UCO Bank and others vs. Sanwar Mal reported in (2004) 4 SCC 412
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.