SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Cal) 994

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CALCUTTA
AMRITA SINHA, J.
Usha Biswas — Appellant
Versus
State Of West Bengal — Respondent
WP No. 21905 (W) of 2017
Decided on : 12-10-2018

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Sourav Kumar Mukherjee, Advocate, Mr. Binoy Chandra Dhara, Advocate
For the K.M.D.A:Mr. Partha Sarathi Basu, Advocate, Mr. Satyajit Talukdar, Advocate
For the Respondent:Kalimuddin Mondal, Advocate, Mr. Bipin Ghosh, Advocate

The obligation of the vendor to convey an encumbrance-free, good, and marketable title subject to contract to the contrary.

Headnote:

KMDA - Housing Project - West Bengal Cooperative Societies Act, 1983 - Summary: The court directed KMDA to execute the necessary deed of transfer of the subject apartment in favor of the petitioners within a period of ten weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioners will be at liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings for compensation and damages against the respondents if so advised.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners applied for allotment of an apartment in a housing project by KMDA. After paying the entire sale price, KMDA failed to execute the deed of sale, citing a land allotment policy issued in 2012. The Society filed a complaint case before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, which was dismissed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The petitioners then filed a writ petition seeking execution of the deed of sale.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the order of the Land and Land Reforms Department dated 26th December, 2012 and the notification dated 10th November, 2016 were not applicable to the petitioners. The court directed KMDA to execute the necessary deed of transfer of the subject apartment in favor of the petitioners within a period of ten weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Issues: The main issue was the applicability of the land allotment policy issued in 2012 to the petitioners' case and the failure of KMDA to execute the deed of sale in favor of the petitioners.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the order of the Land and Land Reforms Department dated 26th December, 2012 and the subject notification dated 10th November, 2016 were not applicable to the petitioners. The court also emphasized the obligation of the vendor to convey an encumbrance-free, good, and marketable title subject to contract to the contrary.

Final Decision: The court directed KMDA to execute the necessary deed of transfer of the subject apartment in favor of the petitioners within a period of ten weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioners were also granted liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings for compensation and damages against the respondents if so advised.

JUDGMENT :

Amrita Sinha, J.

The offer:

Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority (KMDA for short) initiated a housing project viz. Barrackpore Housing Project Phase - II comprising of various flats/shops/offices including common area and garages. KMDA published a brochure mentioning in details about the location, scheme, amenities, price, eligibility criteria, application procedure, mode of allotment, service charge, home loan facility, refund/general information, documentation for transfer of the apartment on payment of entire sale price etc. An applicant could submit in filled application form/application money at the bank branches mentioned in the said brochure.

2. The brochure mentioned that the scheme envisaged the outright sale of 288 apartments. There was provision for outright payments scheme and instalment payment scheme. Selection of allottees and assignment of apartment to the allottees was to be decided by draw of lots. There was home loan facility which could have been availed from any nationalised bank and/or financial institutions subject to fulfilment of required financial criteria. It was mentioned that KMDA shall handover possession of the apartment to the allottees only after full and final payment and formation of cooperative housing societies for the maintenance of common services and common areas. Subject to the conditions prescribed in the said brochure the apartments were to be transferred by KMDA in favour of the allottees by way of outright sale after payment of the final amount of the price in full and on execution and/or registration of the deed of transfer in the form prescribed by KMDA. The stamp duty, registration fee and all other expenses related to the execution and/or registration of the deed was payable by the allottees. There was a bar for transfer of the apartment by the allottee within five years from the date of execution of the deed of conveyance without prior permission of KMDA. It was further mentioned that KMDA had absolute right and title of the land on which the apartment was being constructed.

Acceptance:

3. The petitioners upon going through the information mentioned in the brochure made an application for allotment of an apartment in their favour. The said application was made on 19th December, 2008 along with a pay order of Rs. 26,000/- only. KMDA issued a letter of allotment in favour of the petitioners on 13th January, 2009 wherein the provisional sale price of the apartment was mentioned as Rs. 6,06,000/- (six lakh six thousand) only.

Hand-over of possession:

4. Vide a memo dated 4th February, 2009 KMDA issued a possession advice in favour of the petitioners wherein it had been indicated that as the petitioners deposited the entire premium amount the petitioners were entitled and authorised to take physical possession of the apartment personally. It was further mentioned that documents required for transfer of the apartment in their favour were under preparation by the law cell and the same would be forwarded to them as soon as the deemed society is registered under the West Bengal Cooperative Societies Act, 1983. Pursuant to the aforesaid possession advice the petitioners took possession of the apartment on 13th February, 2009 and a formal possession certificate was issued by KMDA in favour of the petitioners. In the said possession certificate it was mentioned that the apartment would be transferred by way of sale to the allottee. It was further mentioned that if the allottee does not get the deed executed and registered within the appointed date the allotment is liable to be cancelled at the discretion of KMDA in accordance with the terms and conditions published in the brochure.

Acceptance of sale price:

5. The petitioners paid the entire sale price of the apartment in question by a bank draft. Barrackpore Housing Cooperative Society Limited was the Society that was formed by the allottees of the said project in accordance with the terms mentioned in the brochure and the said Soc

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top