SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Cal) 22

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
TIRTHANKAR GHOSH, J.
Haradhan Dutta – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal and Another – Respondents
CRA No. 672 of 2016
Decided On : 30-04-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Jayanta Narayan Chatterjee, Apalak Basu, Nazir Ahmed, Swagata Das, Nandini Chatterjee, Jayashree Patra, Chandrima Roy Karmakar.
For the Respondent: Avik Ghatak.

Point of Law: Reliability of witnesses - Prosecution witnesses - Throughout cross-examination truthfulness of prosecution version was challenged to limited extent of veracity of witnesses who had been deposing before Court and it is only for first time while being examined under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. accused took a plea “I was going along the road and stopped to purchase cigarette and then some other persons apprehended and detained me.” Such a plea at least fortifies presence of accused at place of occurrence and same supports prosecution version of being present in red light area as narrated by prosecution witness.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 363 and 366A - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 313 - Offence of Kidnapping and Prosecution of minor girl - Victim, in her deposition before Court stated that her parents are residing at Lucknow and she was staying with her grand-mother, as such for purpose of visiting her parents she went to Howrah Station. At Howrah Station she approached ticket counter for purchasing a ticket and on seeing a large gathering near counter she decided to sit at station, after sometime she felt hungry and went outside to purchase some food and after sometime she observed a person (accused) took sit beside her and asked her name and where she would be going After knowing that she would be going to Lucknow the person stated that the train was at night and whether she had any food. The said person (accused) offered her food which she refused. Accused was constantly disturbing her - Victim/witness refused, however, the accused convinced her by representing that she should not worry about anything as he was a police - Thereafter accused boarded an auto-rickshaw and took her near a road where she found that many girls were wearing short dresses, smoking cigarettes and accused took her to a room and instructed her that if anyone asked her then victim should represent that in order to find a job the accused had brought her there - When he was climbing stairs she found an altercation was going on between accused and another person and after following said person she went to a room where she found a lady was eating guava who asked her name and why she had been in this place then she stated that accused had brought her at this place at his friend’s house - Victim narrated that e lady told her that accused had brought her to this place for selling her - Victim described whole incident and how accused induced her for coming to this place, when the lady assured her that she was in safe hands and thereafter started beating the accused.

Finding of the Court:

It is well settled that minor variations should not be taken into consideration while assessing reliability of testimony of a witness and the consistency of prosecution witness must be taken as a whole - On an analysis of the evidence of the prosecution witnesses and the examination under Section 313 of Code of Criminal Procedure, this Court finds that judgment and order of conviction and sentence so passed by the Ld. Trial Court do not suffer from any infirmity and as such no interference is called for.

Result: CRA dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

TIRTHANKAR GHOSH, J.

1. The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 27.09.2016 and 28.09.2016 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, F.T. Court No. II, Bichar Bhawan, Calcutta, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 2(4)2013 arising out of Sessions Case No. 05 of 2013 where the appellant was held guilty for commission of offences punishable under Sections 363 and 366A of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The learned Trial Court was thereafter pleased to sentence the accused as under:

    (i) The convict Haradhan Dutta is sentenced to suffer imprisonment for five (5) years and to pay fine of Rs. 10,000/- for the offence under Section 363 of I.P.C. i.d. to suffer R.I. for six months.

(ii) The convict Haradhan Dutta is also sentenced to suffer R.I. for seven (7) years and to pay fine of Rs. 10,000/- i.d. to suffer R.I. for six months for the offence under Section 366A of I.P.C.

3. The genesis of the case relates to a statement of the victim girl namely, Rangila Khatoon, recorded by Sub-Inspector of Police attached to Detective Department on 06.08.2012 pursuant to which Burtolla Police Case No. 344/2012 dated 06.08.2012 was registered for investigation under Section 366A/372/511/120B of the Indian Penal Code.

4. The statement of the victim which has been treated to be the First Information Report of the instant case is as follows:

    “My name is Rangila Khatoon. I am 14 years old. My residential address is, Village: Nohalberia, Post-Batul, P.S. Bagnan, District Howrah. I have studied upto class V in Nohalberia School. My father Taj Mohammad and mother Sabana Begam live in Lucknow. My two younger brothers and a sister also live in Lucknow with father and mother since long. I visited there 2/3 times. My father works in a hotel there. I live with my grand mother Nurbanu Begum in our village. Our financial condition is not stable. As my grandmother was unable to afford my studies, I had to engage myself as a house maid (for washing utensils) for sometimes. Almost 15/20 days back as I rang my father, he told me to go to Lucknow to stay with them. Since our Eid festival is ensuing, so I was been to visit my father and mother. Today (6.8.12), in order to go to Lucknow, I set off from home, alone in the morning. The train was scheduled to depart in the night, still I left home well before. When I stepped down on platform no. 11 in the Howrah Station, a man approached me and asked my where about. I told him all. The man told me that I had enough time in hand, before the schedule departure of my train to Lucknow. He told me to accompany him to one of his friends house and after spending some time there, he himself would come to back with me to help me in boarding illegible train. The man introduced himself as a police personnel and that is why I trusted him. After that, he brought me to Kolkata at about 2.30 P.M. by availing the ferry service from Howrah. After reaching Kolkata he hired an autorickshaw and took me to a place which was very crowded and where I saw something like rail tracks (later came to road as tram car). He then told me that I am taking you to my friend’s house, but on the way, you don’t walk beside me and keep some distance. While we were approaching a narrow lane, I saw some well-dressed girls waiting there. When I asked him about the place, he told me nothing to be worried. But, I could realize that the place was not safe. The man had taken me there with an aim either to sell me or for any bad intention. I started shouting. The girls who were there caught hold of the man. Thereafter, many other girls came there. Police arrived. Rescued me. The police, in front of those girls, questioned me. I told them everything, the man, while we were travelling by Auto, told his name as Haradhan Dutta. I have told everything before the police so that the man gets punishment. After that police arrested that man (Haradhan Dutta) and left the place.”

5. The Investigatin

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top