SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Cal) 297

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Subhendu Samanta, J.
Nilmani Bhattyacharya - Appellant
Versus
State Of West Bengal And Another - Respondent
C.R.R. No. 4217 of 2017 with IA No. CRAN 2 of 2020 (Old No. CRAN 1079 of 2020)
Decided On : 26-09-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Atis Kumar Biswas, Adv., Mr. Prosenjit De, Adv., Mr. Amit Sing,Adv., Ms. Jyoti Agarwal,Adv., for the Appellant; Mr. Imran Ali, Adv., Mr. Debjani Sahu,Adv., for the Respondent

The main legal point established is that the secretary of a registered co-operative society is deemed to be a public servant under Section 10 of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act of 2006, and thus can be charged under relevant sections of the IPC.

Headnote:

Co-operative Society - Criminal Revision - West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act of 2006 - Section 10, Section 21 of the IPC

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed an application u/s 156(3) of Cr.P.C. against the private OP No. 2 for alleged offences U/s 409/420/323 of IPC. The police investigation resulted in a charge sheet against the private OP No. 2. The accused sought discharge from the offence alleged U/s 409 of IPC, claiming not to be a public servant. The court found the accused to be a public servant and set aside the impugned order, directing framing of charges under Section 409 IPC.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the secretary of a registered co-operative society is deemed to be a public servant within the meaning of Section 21 of the IPC, as per Section 10 of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act of 2006. It concluded that the impugned order was illegal and directed framing of charges under Section 409 IPC.

Issues: The main issue was whether the accused, as the secretary of a co-operative society, could be considered a public servant under the law.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Section 10 of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act of 2006, which explicitly deems the officers of co-operative societies to be public servants within the meaning of Section 21 of the IPC. It also considered the involvement of public money in the alleged offence as a factor in its decision.

Final Decision: The impugned order was set aside, and the court directed framing of charges under Section 409 IPC against the accused.

JUDGMENT

Subhendu Samanta, J. - The instant Criminal Revision has been preferred against Order dated 17.05.2017 passed by the Learned Judge, Special Court (1st Court) Hooghly at Chinsurah in connection with special case No. 7 of 2015 arising out GR Case No 1902 of 2013 corresponding to Chinsurah P.S Case No. 366 of 2013 dated 18.11.2013 U/s 409/420/379 IPC.

2. A very short point is involved in the instant revisional application. One application was filed by the present petitioner before the Chief Judicial Magistrate Hooghly u/s 156(3) of Cr.P.C. against the private OP No. 2 for alleged commission of offence U/s 409/420/323 of IPC.

3. Learned Magistrate after being satisfied forwarded the said application to I.O Chinsurah P.S. for causing investigation on treating the same as FIR. Accordingly the Police Case was started. The investigation of the police is ended in charge sheet vide charge sheet No. 238 of 2015 dated 15.05.2015 U/s 409/420/379 of IPC against the private OP No. 2.

4. The accused/OP No. 2 obtained the court bail and appeared before the Learned Special Court with an application for discharge from the offence alleged to have been committed U/s 409 of IPC with a ground that the accused is not a public servant. Learned Special Court on hearing Learned Advocate and the state passed the impugned Order with an opinion that case against the accused person/ OP No. 2 U/s 409 IPC is not tenable.

Hence this revision.

5. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted before this court that the private OP No. 2 was the previous secretary of Hooghly Zilla Khadi 'O' Kutir Shilpa Pratisthan. It is a Society, registered under the Society Registration Act and its activities are duly monitored by West Bengal Khadi and Village Industries Board. It has been alleged in the FIR that after the petitioner became the secretary of the Co-operative Society, it had been noticed that OP NO.2 had misappropriated the money of the Said Society.

6. The investigation of the police also ended in charge sheet accusing the Private OP No. 2 regarding his involvement by the alleged offence.

7. Learned Advocate for the petitioner further argued that the opinion of the Learned Special Court in the impugned Order is palpably wrong in the eye of law.

8. According to the provisions of b, the officers Co-operative Societies are Public servant within the meaning of Section 21 of the IPC. He further argued that the impugned order passed by the Learned Special Court is suffered illegality and it is liable to be set aside.

9. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the State submitted that the Hooghly Zilla Khadi 'O' Kutir Shilpa Pratisthan is a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act. The society is governed under the Director Control of the State of West Bengal. The public money is involved for the day to day functioning of the society. Thus, the secretary of the society is no doubt a public servant. So, he argued the view of the Learned Special Court is not correct.

10. Heard, the Learned Advocated perused the impugned order also perused the petition of complaint. It has been stated in the petition of complaint that while private OP 2/ accused was acted as a secretary of Hooghly Zilla Khadi 'O' Kutir Shilpa Pratisthan, he had defalcated a huge amount of money of the said Co-operative Society. Charge sheet suggested, during the course of investigation several notices under Section 91 of Cr.P.C. were served by the investigating agency but the accused did not responded to any of the notices. The IO also served a notice upon the accused/OP No. 2 U/s 41 (A) of Cr.P.C.. But the Accused/ OP No. 2 also did not meet the IO.

11. Let me consider whether the OP NO. 2 i.e. the erstwhile secretary of a co-operative Society is actually public servant or not. Section 10 of West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act of 2006 enumerated 10. Officers of co- operative Societies to be public servants.- Every officer of a Co-operative society shall be deemed to be a public servant wit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top