SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Cal) 660

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Shampa Sarkar, J.
Mahendra Kumar Jain - Appellant
Versus
The State Of West Bengal And Others - Respondent
W.P.A. No. 17293 of 2021
Decided On : 14-06-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Kalyan Bandopadhyay, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Anuj Singh, Mr. S. Chowdhury, Mr. Ajay Agarwal, Mr. Sanket Sarawgi, Mr. Arka Banerjee, for the Appellant; Mrs. Chama Mookherji, Mr. Siraj Goopta, for the Respondent.

Constitution of a Special Investigating Team to handle cases of gravity such as dowry death and crime against women.

Headnote:

Investigation - Special Investigating Team - Indian Penal Code - Sections 306, 498A, 34, 304B, 406 - The court opines that a Special Investigating Team consisting of senior and experienced police officers should be constituted to investigate the gravity of the offences relating to dowry death and crime against women. The team is expected to be led by Smt. Damayanti Sen, Special Commissioner of Police (II), Kolkata Police, and shall involve the respondent No.6 as a part of the team. The court reposes full faith in the investigating agency and expects positive results by the next date.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, father of the deceased victim, alleges physical and mental torture inflicted by the husband and in-laws, leading to the victim's death. The investigating agency is accused of neglecting the investigation, prompting the petitioner to seek court's interference.

Finding of the Court:

The court finds the investigation to be slow and directionless, and opines that a Special Investigating Team should be constituted to handle the case effectively.

Issues: Allegations of physical and mental torture, neglect in the investigation, and delay in obtaining the report from the Central Forensic Science Laboratory.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision to constitute a Special Investigating Team and reposing faith in the investigating agency.

Final Decision: The court directs the Special Commissioner of Police to constitute a team of competent officers to take over the investigation and expects positive results by the next date.

JUDGMENT

1. The petitioner is the father of the deceased victim. The victim was married to one Kushal Agarwal on February 9, 2020. Records reveal that there were instances when the deceased had met her parents time and again soon after the marriage and intimated them about the alleged physical and mental torture inflicted by her husband and the alleged debauchery the husband had indulged in.

2. It appears that the parents did not pay much attention to such complaints and ultimately on February 16, 2021 the petitioner received a call from the mother-in-law of the deceased, informing him that his daughter had fallen from the terrace of her matrimonial home and was taken to Woodlands Hospital.

3. The victim succumbed her injuries on the same day. A whatsapp message was received by the petitioner. It was sent by his deceased daughter, which reads as follows:-

It's better that I die than live in this family or with what will be done to me if I leave this family.so please don't miss me and byebye.

4. The petitioner lodged a complaint on February 17, 2021 before the Alipore Police Station and Alipore Police Station Case No.15 of 2021 dated February 17, 2021 under Sections 306/498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code was initiated. A post mortem was conducted. On February 25, 2021, the petitioner submitted another complaint narrating the details of the behaviour of the in-laws of the deceased. Investigation was transferred to the Detective Department of the Women's Grievance Cell, Lalbazar. After the post mortem, a prayer was made by the investigating officer for adding Section 304B along with Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Alipore, which was allowed. On the basis of the order passed by the learned Magistrate, seized articles and the mobile phones were sent to the Central Forensic Science Laboratory at Bhopal, for data extraction and expert opinion.

5. The records reveal that the husband of the victim filed an application for anticipatory bail before this Court, and thereafter withdrew the same. A non-bailable warrant was issued by the criminal court on the prayer of the investigating officer. The warrant was not executed.

6. Thereafter the husband, once again, moved this Court. An interim protection was granted to the husband till the disposal of the application for anticipatory bail. The warrant of arrest was recalled. The application for anticipatory bail was rejected by this Court, by an order dated February 23, 2022. The husband is at large.

7. The allegation is that the investigating agency has failed and neglected to proceed with the investigation with the judiciousness, seriousness, expedition and sensitivity which this case deserved. It is alleged that the investigating agency did not make any endeavour for restoration of the warrant of arrest after the rejection of the application for anticipatory bail. That no report has yet been obtained from the Central Forensic Science Laboratory at Bhopal. Hence, interference of this court has been called for as the father has lost hope on the system and the feels that the truth relating to the death of his bright, young and beautiful daughter would never be unravelled. The petitioner feels that the Sub-Inspector who is the investigating officer, is under tremendous pressure.

8. Mrs. Mookherji, learned Senior Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of the police authorities, files a report prepared by the Officer-in-Charge, Women's Grievances Cell, Detective Department, Kolkata and submits that the investigation has been conducted to the best of the ability of the respondent No.6. The learned Magistrate also rejected the prayer for day to day monitoring of the investigation. According to the learned Magistrate, the investigation was going on in an unbiased manner and there was no need for day to day interference by the Court. The police report is taken on record.

9. Having considered the graveness of the allegations, the social position of the partie

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top