Back
BIBEK CHAUDHURI
Dipak Kumar Mondal – Appellant
Versus
State Of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Bibek Chaudhuri, J. - The convicts of Sessions Trial No.8(8) of 2014 arising out of Sessions Case No.22 of 2014 have filed the instant appeal assailing the order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge at Raghunathpur, Purulia for the offence punishable under Section 326/34 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. Raghunathpur P.S. Case No.75 of 2013 was registered on the basis of a written complaint submitted by one Anil Chandra Mondal stating, inter alia, that on the event date at about 8 am when he went to visit his old homestead near Aguibari post office, the appellants namely, Dipak Mondal, Anirban Mondal, Tapas Mondal, Gayeswar Mondal and Thanda Mondal in furtherance of their common intention caused grievous hurt on his person and specifically Dipak Mondal assaulted him on his neck, back and hand with the help of a sharp cutting weapon, called, 'tangi'. After receiving bleeding injury, the defacto complainant was admitted to Raghunathpur Super Specialty Hospital.
3. The aforesaid complaint was written by one Chittaranjan Mondal and specific case was registered against the appellants at about 10:05 am.
4. After investigation police submit
The court considered discrepancies in the complainant's statement but ultimately relied on the evidence of the witnesses and the nature of the injuries to uphold the conviction.
The duty of the court to assess the evidence, the principles of circumstantial evidence, and the application of relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code were the central legal points established in....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of proof for the specific elements of each charge under the Indian Penal Code.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the successful proof of the charge against the appellants under Sections 325/34 of the Indian Penal Code, as well as the application of the Probati....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of different sections of IPC, specifically Section 307, Section 326, and Section 448, in determining the appella....
The prosecution failed to prove the charges of attempted murder and grievous hurt due to lack of evidence regarding intent and the nature of injuries.
Intent to kill under Section 307 IPC necessitates specific evidence; absence of concrete proof results in acquittal for grievous intent while confirming lesser charges.
Unexplained delay in lodging the FIR is fatal for the prosecution. The prosecution must establish the place of occurrence and the identity of the accused. Contradictions in the evidence should not di....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
