Back
BIBEK CHAUDHURI
Sujit Bhowmick – Appellant
Versus
State Of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Bibek Chaudhuri, J. - The appellant faced trial on the charge under Sections 448, 376/511 and 325 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code, IPC in short and on completion of trial the learned additional Sessions Judge Uluberia, found him guilty for committing offence under Sections 354, 448 and 323 of the IPC and he was convicted and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years with fine and default clause for committing offence under Section 354 of the IPC, rigorous imprisonment for six months with fine and default clause for the offence punishable under Section 448 of the IPC and rigorous imprisonment for six months with fine and default clause for committing offence under Section 323 of the IPC in Sessions Trial No.116(U) of 2014 on 5th July, 2016.
2. The order of conviction and sentence is assailed in the instant appeal.
3. On 28th august, 2013 the defacto complainant lodged a written complaint before the Officer-in-Charge, Shyampur Police Station stating, inter alia, that her husband used to work at the relevant point of time in Kolkata. She used to reside alone in her house at village Gadiara. On 24th august, 2013 at about 2 am at night, accused Sujit Bhowmik @ Vik
Credibility of evidence, unexplained delay in lodging the complaint, and contradictions regarding the place of occurrence were central legal points established in the judgment.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of corroborative evidence, credibility of witness testimony, and giving the accused the benefit of doubt when two views are found fr....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the significance of timely lodging of FIR, the importance of evidence in proving the intention and knowledge of the accused in outraging the modest....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for credible evidence, including timely filing of FIR and supporting medical and circumstantial evidence, in cases of alleged ra....
The duty of the prosecution to establish that the case is not concocted, the duty of the court to consider delay in filing the FIR, and the importance of prompt registration of FIR for access to just....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for corroboration of the prosecutrix's testimony and the importance of trustworthy and unblemished evidence in cases of rape.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the prosecutrix's testimony to be trustworthy, reliable, and of 'sterling quality' to convict the accused in a case under Secti....
The absence of penetration negates conviction under Section 376/511, but the act of attempting to outrage modesty warrants conviction under Section 354 IPC.
Prompt reporting of the incident and consistent testimony of the prosecutrix can be sufficient to establish guilt for the offence under sections 341 and 354 of the IPC.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
