IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Joymalya Bagchi, Kausik Chanda, JJ.
Md. Wasim - Appellant
Versus
State Of West Bengal - Respondent
C.R.A. 484 of 2004
Decided On : 04-01-2022
matricide - Indian Penal Code - Section 302, Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure - The court discussed the evidence of the prosecution witnesses, the judicial confession made by the appellant, and the plea of mental imbalance. The court found that the appellant's judicial confession was voluntary and truthful, and that the evidence corroborated the confession. The court also rejected the plea of mental imbalance, stating that the appellant failed to establish that he was unaware of the consequences of his act due to mental ailment. The conviction and sentence of the appellant were upheld.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant was convicted for matricide and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life and a fine. The prosecution's case was based on the evidence of the appellant's wife and other witnesses, as well as the appellant's judicial confession. The appellant claimed innocence and false implication, and also raised a plea of mental ailments.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the appellant guilty based on the evidence of the prosecution witnesses and the voluntary and truthful judicial confession made by the appellant. The plea of mental imbalance was rejected as the appellant failed to establish that he was unaware of the consequences of his act due to mental ailment.
Issues: The issues involved the credibility of the prosecution witnesses, the voluntariness of the appellant's judicial confession, and the plea of mental imbalance.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the appellant's judicial confession was voluntary and truthful, and that the evidence corroborated the confession. The plea of mental imbalance was rejected as the appellant failed to establish that he was unaware of the consequences of his act due to mental ailment.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence of the appellant were upheld.
JUDGMENT
Joymalya Bagchi, J. - The appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 09.03.2004 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 5th Fast Track Court, Calcutta in connection with Sessions Trial no. 1(4) of 2003 arising out of Sessions Case No. 22/2003 convicting the appellant for commission of offence punishable under Section 302 and sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three more months.
2. This is a case of matricide. In the early hours of 06.10.2002 it is alleged that the appellant had hit his mother on the head with a kitchen grinding stone resulting in instantaneous death. His wife, Safia Begum, PW-3 found the appellant standing in the bedroom of her mother-in-law with a blood stained kitchen grinding stone. Her mother-in-law was lying on the floor. Blood was oozing out from her ears. Appellant threatened her not to raise alarm. Around 6.15 hours, an unknown person made a phone call at Bowbazar Police Station stating that an assault had taken place at 33, Harinbari Lane, Kolkata - 73.
3. PW-9, Mahadeb Singha Roy, who was posted therein as S.I. of police diarised the incident and proceeded to the spot. He recorded the statement of PW-3, which was treated as the FIR. Appellant was arrested and the weapon of offence was also seized from the spot. In the meantime, relations were informed and PW-6, son-in-law of the deceased rushed to the spot. Appellant admitted his guilt before his brother-in-law, PW-6. During investigation, appellant also made a judicial confession before the Magistrate under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Charge sheet was filed against him and charge was framed under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Appellant pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.
4. In the course of trial, prosecution examined 13 witnesses and exhibited a number of documents. In conclusion of trial, the trial Court by judgment and order dated 09.03.2004 convicted and sentenced the appellant as aforesaid.
5. Defence of the appellant was one of innocence and false implication. A faint plea was also taken that the appellant was suffering from mental ailments.
6. Mr. Suman De, learned lawyer appearing on behalf of the appellant argues that the prosecution case suffers from various inconsistencies and improbabilities. Motive to commit crime has not been proved. Evidence has come on record that appellant was suffering from mental ailments. It is possible that he committed the incident while he was suffering from a bout of insanity. It is also argued FSL report did not show presence of human blood on the kitchen grinding stone. Hence, it cannot be said to be the weapon of offence. Judicial confession made by the appellant was recorded in Bengali although he is a Hindi speaking person. The appellant claimed that he had been coerced by the police to make the confession. Hence, it is of little evidentiary value. Thus, the appellant is entitled to an order of acquittal.
7. On the other hand, learned lawyer for the State submits that the evidence on record, particularly that of his wife, PW-3 show that the relationship between the appellant and his mother was strained over money matters. The appellant was found standing with a blood stained kitchen grinding stone in the room where the deceased was lying with blood injuries.
8. He made extra judicial confession before PW-6 and also admitted his guilt before the Magistrate. The appellant was actively pursuing business and family life and there is no evidence that he was suffering from any mental illness at the time of occurrence. Hence, the appeal is liable to be dismissed.
9. PW-3 is the wife of the appellant. She deposed that she married the appellant in 2002 and they were residing in a rented flat with her mother-in- law, the deceased, in the first floor of 33, Harinbari lane, Kolkata - 73. They used to stay in one room while her mother
Voluntariness of judicial confession and establishment of mental ailment as a defense under the general exception of legal insanity.
The court established that conviction for murder under circumstantial evidence requires a complete and clear chain of evidence, supporting the inference of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Merely being relatives of deceased or injured is no ground to reject testimony of witnesses who are otherwise found to be trustworthy and reliable.
The court established that circumstantial evidence, when unbroken and corroborated by confession, can lead to a conviction for murder, emphasizing the burden of proof on the accused.
Act of appellant would fall under exception 4 to Section 300 of Indian Penal Code as appellant did not intend to kill his wife, however, knowledge that his act of assault by lathi may likely to cause....
In a murder case, the court must consider both aggravating and mitigating circumstances before imposing a sentence. The death sentence should be imposed only in the rarest of rare cases.
The court upheld the conviction for murder based on circumstantial evidence and the appellant's post-incident conduct, despite the inadmissibility of his confession.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on circumstantial evidence, the shift of burden of proof to the appellant, and the admissibility of extra-judicial confessions in esta....
Point of Law : Even sub-clause (4) of Section 164 Cr.P.C. clearly indicates that such confession must be recorded in the manner provided under Section 281 Cr.P.C.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.