Back
SUBHENDU SAMANTA
Neha Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State Of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Subhendu Samanta, J. - Both the criminal revisional applications were filed by Neha, a married lady along with her parents and brother for quashing of two criminal proceedings filed by the in-laws.
2. CRR 1770 of 2018 was filed for quashing of proceeding being GR Case No. 1938 of 2017 arising out of Coke Oven P.S Case No. 148 of 2017 u/s 406,420,120B, 506 of IPC. Now pending before the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Durgapur, initiated by brother-in-law of Neha. CRR 3681 of 2015 was filed for quashing of CR No. 507 of 2014 initiated by mother-in-law of Neha on 14.12.2014 pending before JM, 3rd Court Durgapur u/s- 147,323,379,427,504,506 and 31 IPC.
3. The brief fact of the case is that the marriage between Neha Kumari and Rakesh Prasad Gupta was solemnised on 14.02.2014 according to Hindu Rights and Customs. After married the matrimonial disputes between the parties were cropped up.
4. Neha Kumari lodged at Women P.S. Chaibasa vide FIR No. 6 of 2014 dated 22.10.2014 u/s 498A and 314 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Investigation police ended in charge sheet vide charge sheet No. 55/2015 dated 20.05.2015 u/s 498A of IPC against husband, mother-in-law, father-in-law and
The court held that the criminal proceedings against the petitioners were an abuse of process of court and could be quashed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
The Court quashed the FIR against distant relatives accused in a dowry case, emphasizing the need for specific allegations rather than general and omnibus claims in matrimonial disputes.
Vague, omnibus allegations in matrimonial disputes are insufficient to sustain criminal charges against in-laws under dowry laws; specific evidence is required to proceed, preventing misuse of legal ....
The court emphasized the necessity to quash criminal proceedings when allegations do not constitute an offence, especially in matrimonial disputes resolved amicably with mutual consent and alimony.
The court emphasized preventing misuse of criminal law in matrimonial disputes, ruling that vague allegations against family members warrant quashing of proceedings. Specific wrongdoing must be demon....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the High Court should refrain from exercising its power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure when the trial is at an advanced s....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
