IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Subrata Talukdar, Supratim Bhattacharya, JJ.
State of West Bengal & Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
M/s. K.C. Das Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
FMA 302 of 2019 With IA No. CAN 3 of 2021
Decided On : 19-06-2023
Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 – Vacant Land -Declaration of land as excess - Whether land in issue was a vacant land and if that was so on appointed date of coming into force - Held, This Court ipso facto on a combined reading of does not find thats Company has been able to make out a case for protection Section 2 (q)(i) particularly having regard to historical narrative of said land being vacant in terms of its Return corresponding to appointed as well as its back to back applications for exemptions to construct over entire land - Since the State of West Bengal has not yet adopted the Repealing Act of 1999, such repeal has no binding force in the facts of this case and the Hon’ble Single Bench could not have therefore held against the State on the basis of the provisions contained in the 1999 Act - Appeal Allowed.
JUDGMENT :
Subrata Talukdar, J.
1. The short point to be decided in this appeal is whether the land in issue (hereinafter referred to as the said land) was a vacant land and, if that was so on the appointed date of coming into force of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (for short, the 1976 Act) which was the 14th of February 1976, whether the Competent Authority (for short, referred to only as the CA) was entitled to declare the said land to be in excess.
2. The Hon’ble Single Bench by its Judgement and Order dated 14th of March 2017 in WP 11004 (W) of 2011, which is impugned in this appeal, has, inter alia, discussed as follows:-
26. It is also evident from the KMC record appearing at Page 42 of the writ petition which is a certified copy of inspection book in respect of 4 Tara Sankar Sarani with effect from 3/79-80, relevant portion whereof is quoted below :-
Premises No.4 Description Name and address of recorded owner
4. Cor D.H. & Land 4 M/s. K.C. Das Ltd, 3, Ram Krishna Lane, Cal-3
Corner plot
Total Area= 1B-15CH-25 Sft.
Addn.
Cor/BW-1r+Ver-Muraridhar Tewari (Owner‘s Darwan) ) R.T. /B.W. –1r++1r (Sm) Thakurghar )--730-p.m. + Tax + 1P !Asb/B.W-1r )
Land 1B-8CH @ 40/- P.K. P.M. = 9840/-
Certified copy of Inspection Book in respect of Premises No.4 Tarasankar Sarani.Wd-005, Qtr.3/73-74.Assessee No.11-00524000090.Challan No.A0261729 Dt. 28/2/2011.
Premises No. Nature of use Name and address of recorded owners
4. Land +Tank M/s. K.C. Das Ltd, 3, Ramkrishna Lane, Cal-3
“3-That with a view to expansion of its business both at home and abroad, your petitioner purchased vacant land at No.2 Jogendra Nath Bose Lane, now No.4, Talla Park Avenue, Calcutta-700 002, measuring 2355.94 sq. metres in 1951 in order to construct a new and modern factory with Research and Development Division, Export Division, Laboratory, Staff and Director‘s quarters. That the said land was improved upon after purchase by building 1-’ft high boundary wall, tube well and Darwan‘s quarters. Your petitioner has been unable to construct the proposed new factory due to lack of adequate funds and other factors beyond its control.
4. That your petitioner has constructed a factory and opened a showroom in Bangalore in 1972. Your petitioner has a plan to set up a factory in or around Bombay in the near future. Your petitioner desires to set up the proposed new factory in Calcutta on its own land before setting up anymore factories in other States, because of the increasing demand for your petitioner products in West Bengal, and it will be more economically viable and convene from the point of view of management and control. Your petitioner submits that the setting up of its factory on its own land in Talla Park Avenue, Calcutta-700 002 will not only offer opportunities of employment to some more personnel but also
Land occupied by a building with a dwelling unit that was constructed or in the process of construction on the appointed day is not "any other land" within the meaning of Section 4(9) of the Urban La....
Revised Section 8(4) order under ULC Act supersedes prior Section 20 exemption, rendering it non est despite Repeal Act savings for valid exemptions only.
Exemption orders under Section 20(1) of the Urban Land Ceiling Act remain valid post-repeal if no violation of conditions occurs, rendering withdrawal attempts unlawful.
It is incumbent upon the competent authority to be in actual possession of the property for substantiating its stand that the provisions of repeal Act would not be applicable.
Abatement of land ceiling proceeding – Payment of compensation has nothing to do with taking over of possession – Payment of compensation under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and takin....
Point of law: Notifications issued from section 10(1) onwards till section 11 have not been quashed or set aside by neither the Hon’ble Tribunal, nor this Hon’ble High Court at any stage of litigatio....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.