BIBEK CHAUDHURI
Arpita Sarkar (nee Das) @ Arpita Das – Appellant
Versus
Rahul Chakraborty – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
BIBEK CHAUDHURI, J.
1. The petitioner has filed the instant revision under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying for quashing of the proceeding in connection with AC 601 of 2017 under Sections 384/406/420/506/120B of the Indian Penal Code presently pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate, 2nd Court at Alipore.
2. Before describing the issue involved in the instant revision this Court finds it necessary to state the following facts:-
3. Sometimes in the year 2008 the opposite party came in touch with the petitioner through a social network site. They were in contact in virtual mode for about one year. For the first time the petitioner and the opposite party met during Durgapuja at Kolkata when the petitioner proposed the opposite party about his interest in her. During 2011 the opposite party who was working in a renowned company in Bangalore got an opportunity to visit Budapest for his official work. When the petitioner came to know about the said job opportunity she expressed her desire to buy a flat and asked the opposite party to invest money. The opposite party transferred a sum of Rs.8.8 lakhs through online bank transfer in the bank account of th
Nazir Ahmed vs. Emperor : AIR 1936 PC 253
National Bank of Oman vs. Barakara Abdul Aziz & Anr. reported in (2013) 2 SCC 488
State of U.P. vs. Singhara Singh : AIR 1964 SC 358
State of Jharkhand & Ors vs. Ambay Cements & Anr. : 2005 1 SCC 368
Vijaysinh Chandubha Jadeja vs. State of Gujarat : (2011) 1 SCC 609
Vijay Dhanuka & Ors. vs. Najima Mamtaj Ors. reported in (2014) 14 SCC 638
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.