SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Cal) 294

RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY
Food Corporation of India – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Devajyoti Barman
For the Respondent: Ms. Susmita Saha Dutta, Mr. N. Saha

JUDGMENT :

Raja Basu Chowdhury, J:

1. The present writ application had been filed, inter alia, challenging the order dated 21st September, 2021, passed by the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”), and the order dated 29th July, 2022, passed by the Appellate Authority constituted under the said Act.

2. The petitioner says that the petitioner had engaged the respondent no. 4 from time to time, on no-work-no-pay basis. The respondent no. 4, however, with a malafide intention on 12th December, 2019 had filed an application in Form-‘N’ before the Controlling Authority claiming gratuity. The proceeding was contested by the petitioner and on contested hearing, the Controlling Authority by his order dated 21st September, 2021, was, inter alia, pleased to determine the gratuity payable to the respondent no. 4. Challenging the aforesaid order, a statutory appeal was filed before the Appellate Authority under the said Act.

3. The Appellate Authority, however, by its order dated 29th July, 2022, was, inter alia, pleased to uphold the findings passed by the Controlling Authority and declared that the respondent no. 4 is entitled t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top