IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
RABINDRANATH SAMANTA, J.
Md. Nizam Uddin - Petitioner
Versus
The State of West Bengal and Others - Respondents
WPA No. 22053 of 2017
Decided On : 20-04-2023
Government of West Bengal, Revision of Pay and Allowances Rules, 1998 – Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 14 - Appointed to post - Fix proper scale of pay - Aggrieved by inaction on part of State authority to fix proper scale of pay according to his post, petitioner has preferred petition – Held, Petitioner has been denied proper fixation of his pay at aforesaid scale of pay according to ROPA, 1998, authority concerned has been doing wrong since approval of appointment was accorded in his favour - It was mandated that petitioner would had to complete relevant training course within three years from date of approval, otherwise his increment would be stopped - Petitioner completed required training in year 2011 - Petitioner is not entitled to get incremental benefit of his pay - State respondents are directed to place petitioner in scale of pay of Rs. 3350/- - 6325/- under ROPA Rules 1998 – Petition disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
Rabindranath Samanta, J.
1. Aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the State authority to fix the proper scale of pay according to his post, the petitioner has preferred this writ petition.
2. The background facts which are necessary for adjudication may be adumbrated as under :
By an order being No. 530-Edn(MEE)/3’S’-13/99 dated 31st March, 1999, academic recognition was accorded to the institution without any financial involvement to it. After such sponsorship was conferred on the institution, the petitioner was initially appointed as the Organizing Assistant Teacher (Visually Handicapped) in the institution and subsequently, he was appointed to the post of Craft Instructor (Visually Handicapped) vide appointment letter dated 29th April, 2002.
Subsequently, after conducting an inspection, the District Mass Education Extension Officer, North 24 Parganas submitted a report to the authority concerned vide memo dated 23rd August, 2006 recommending sponsorship of the institution. In the inspection report, the name of the petitioner figured at serial no. 5 as a Craft Teacher having the qualification of B.A. (two year pass). Ultimately, by a memo no. 102-MEE/Sectt/3S-66/2000 dated 7th February, 2007 issued by the Joint Secretary, Mass Education Extension Department, Government of West Bengal, sponsorship was accorded to the institution. As instructed in the memo dated 7th February, 2007, the authority of the institution submitted a list of organizing teaching and non-teaching staff of the institution including the name of the petitioner as the Craft Instructor (Visually Impaired) to the Director of Mass Education Extension for absorption. By an order dated 4th April, 2007 issued by the Director of Mass Education Extension, West Bengal, appointment of the petitioner as the Craft Instructor (V.I.) was approved. In the order dated 4th April, 2007, it was mentioned that the petitioner had no training and he would have to complete the relevant training course within three years. The petitioner obtained a two year Post Graduate Diploma in Art and Craft Examination from Rabindra Bharati University in the year 2011. Besides, he also obtained the Certificate of Bridge Course.
3. By notification dated 20th April, 1995 issued by the Mass Education Extension, Government of West Bengal, Rules and Procedures for recruitment to the post of teaching and non-teaching staff of various Government institutions for the handicapped have been prescribed. As per these recruitment rules, the requisite qualification for appointment to the post of Craft Instructor is school final and certificate in Craft. In terms of a memorandum dated 30th March, 1999 issued by the Mass Education Extension Department, the scale of pay for the Craft Instructor has been prescribed as Rs.1040/- - Rs.1920/- (For matriculate) = Rs.3500/- - Rs.6325/- and Rs.980/- - Rs.1775/- (For others) = Rs.3150/- - Rs.5680/-. The petitioner who, having degree in graduation, is entitled to be placed in the unrevised scale of pay of Rs.3350/- - Rs.6325/- but, he has wrongly been placed in the unrevised scale of pay of Rs.3150/- - Rs.5680/-.
4. In such context, it may be noted that the appointment of one Sukhendu Bishal, Madhyamik Pass, in the post of Craft Instructor in Mahadebdas Handicapped Children, North 24 Parganas was approved with effect from 1st April, 2001 in the scale of pay of Rs. 3350/- - Rs. 6325/- by order dated 8th August, 2003 issued by the Director of Mass Education Extension, Government of West Bengal.
5. Under the aforesaid circumstances, the petitioner by a letter dated 29th November, 2013 issued through his learned advocate, sought for the grant of the benefit of unrevised scale of pay of Rs.3350/- - Rs.63
The main legal point established in the judgment is the protection of vested rights and legitimate expectations of employees in relation to their approved pay scale, and the wrongful and arbitrary na....
The principle of equal pay for equal work cannot be applied to perpetuate illegality; relevant statutory notifications must be adhered to.
Equal pay for equal work is mandated, and entitlements under identical circumstances must be uniformly applied, per Article 14, with financial benefits limited to three years prior to petition filing....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.