KRISHNA RAO
Ram Nath Jhunjhunwala – Appellant
Versus
Saha & Company – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Krishna Rao, J.
1. The plaintiff has filed the instant application for pronouncement of final Judgment against the defendant under Chapter XIIIA of the Original Side Rules of this Court for recovery of vacant, peaceful, khas and physical possession of the suit premises being premises No. 207, Maharshi Debendra Road, Kolkata -700007. The trustees of one Ganpatrai Khemka Charitable Trust, granted lease to Radha Kishan Jhunjhunwala (since deceased) i.e. the predecessor-in-interest of the plaintiff, by an indenture of lease dated 23rd April, 1962, which was duly registered before the Registrar of Assurance, Calcutta in the year 1962, in consideration of monthly rent, reserved and secured therein, in respect of suit property for a period of 51 years, with the option for renewal for a further period of 20 years, from the date of expiry of the said term of 51 years, with the condition that the said Radha Kishan Jhunjhunwala shall build a permanent structure upon such demised premises. Plaintiff has exercised his option to extend its original lease for another 20 years, and the same is still subsisting.
2. The Trustees of Ganpatrai Khemka Charitable Trust transferred the ownership
Amala Palit and Others -vs-Ratna Bose and Others
M/s Mulavi Abdur Rub Firoze & Co. -vs-Jay Krishna Arora
Thika Tenancy - a mere deposit of rent with the Thika Controller cannot ipso facto create a Thika tenancy.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the absence of a thika tenancy at the time of the suit and the continuation of the tenancy on a month-to-month basis rendered the suit for evi....
The court held that expired leases do not create continuing tenancies without mutual consent, rejecting claims based on former rental agreements and emphasizing statutory authority for tenure determi....
A Bharatia under a Thika Tenant is not a tenant within the meaning of the Premises Tenancy Act.
A suit claiming eviction due to illegal occupation does not constitute a commercial dispute under the Commercial Courts Act, requiring only the Controller to determine thika tenancy.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a trial to adjudicate disputed issues, especially regarding lease renewal and the status of the defendants as Thika tenants, an....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.