SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Cal) 350

SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA
Jadav Sardar @ Jadab Sardar – Appellant
Versus
Basudeb Tarafder – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

This matter, although not appearing in the list as per my specific direction to appear on the next working day at the top of the list, the matter is treated to be on the day's list for the limited purpose of passing this order which does not pertain to the merits of the case.

2. By a judicial order dated July 16, 2021, this court had, apart from directing the matter to be returnable on the next working day, had specifically directed the Central Project Coordinator (CPC) to show-cause by 3 p.m. in my chamber as to why the virtual hearing disruptions were going on. Such show- cause reply was filed much after 3 p.m. and was handed over not in my chamber but to my A.C.O. on the said date. The latter was kind enough to immediately convey the same to me. Such report, which is a part of CO No.1237 of 2021, which is also appearing in the list today, discloses merely that endeavour is going on to increase the bandwidth of connectivity for the virtual hearing facilities of this court from 2 mbps to 100 mbps. Such excuse has been put forwarded by the administration at least for the past month. However, since I was a part of a two- Judge Recruitment Committee previously, I personally

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top