MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
Ajibar Rahaman – Appellant
Versus
Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Company Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Moushumi Bhattacharya, J.
1. This is an application for setting aside of an Award dated 30th September, 2021 passed by a learned sole Arbitrator. The ground taken for relief is that the Arbitrator was unilaterally appointed by the respondent.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent/award-holder takes a point of maintainability of the application on the ground that the application has been filed beyond the prescribed limitation under Section 34(3) of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with the proviso. According to counsel, while the Award is of 30th September, 2021, the present application has been filed on 10th April, 2023 which is way beyond the timelines prescribed under Section 34(3) read with the proviso.
3. The point of maintainability is required to be answered first.
4. Section 34(3) of the 1996 Act prescribes three months from the date of the award being received by the applicant for filing of an application for setting aside of the award. The proviso gives the applicant an additional window of thirty days on sufficient cause being shown to the satisfaction of the Court. The timelines under Section 34(3) and the proviso do not permit any further
New Globe Transport Corporation Vs. Magma Shrachi Finance Ltd.
Amrik Singh Vs. Magma Fincorp Ltd.
The State of West Bengal and Anr. v. M/s. Motilal Agarwala and Anr. reported in AIR 2016 Cal 271
Union of India v. Tecco Trichy Engineers & Contractors reported in (2005) 4 SCC 239
Benarsi Krishna Committee v. Karmyogi Shelters Private Limited reported in (2012) 9 SCC 496
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.