Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA
Tilaknagar Industries Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA, J.
1. The present dispute pertains to registration in West Bengal for manufacture and sale of foreign liquor under the Brand Name “Mansion House” which the petitioner has allegedly been carrying on in India since April, 1983, openly and without any objection from any quarter.
2. The UTO Nederland B.V. (in short “the UTO”) allegedly ceded in writing its trademark rights for sale and manufacture of the said brand to the petitioner on February 23, 1987.
3. UTO, on the other hand, had applied for registration of the trademark on April 5, 1983, for sale in India, and got it subsequently.
4. UTO filed in the Bombay High Court a suit, bearing Suit No. 632 of 2009, against the petitioner for declaration and injunction pertaining to the rights of manufacture and sale regarding “Mansion House” in India. The petitioner, staking similar claims, filed a counter claim therein
The scope of Rule 122(c) of the West Bengal Excise (Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1998, in the context of granting registration for the manufacture and sale of foreign liquor under a particular brand name o....
The judgment emphasizes that goodwill must be established within the jurisdiction for trademark protection, rejecting claims based solely on international reputation without local business presence.
Failure to comply with statutory rules for trademark registration, specifically regarding transliteration and translation, warrants cancellation of the registration.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of exhausting alternative remedies provided by the Trade Marks Act before seeking relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of In....
The plaintiff possesses exclusive rights to the title 'Indian Express', and any use of 'New Indian Express' by the defendant beyond specified territories constitutes trademark infringement.
In trademark infringement actions, a presumption of confusion arises if the defendant's mark is identical to that of the registered trademark, fostering the entitlement to interim injunction.
The court held that similar trademarks operating in different markets do not always lead to confusion, emphasizing the need to prove distinctiveness and absence of confusion under the Trade Marks Act....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article