Back
BIVAS PATTANAYAK
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sri Jagannath Ojha – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Bivas Pattanayak, J.) :
1. This appeal is preferred against the judgment and award dated 30th March, 2021 passed by learned Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Fast Track, 1st Court, Contai, Purba Medinipur in M.A.C. Case No. 2 of 2015 granting compensation of Rs. 14,03,114/- together with interest in favour of the claimant under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
2. The brief fact of the case is that on 4th November, 2014 at about 12:30 hours while the victim was sitting on his stationed motor cycle bearing registration no. WB-32F/4697 and was talking with a person besides Contai-Mecheda pitch road near Hena Oil (Fuel) Pump, at that time, the offending vehicle bearing registration no. WB-32D/2470 (motor cycle) in a 2 rash and negligent manner moving from Contai to Marishda lost control and dashed backside of the motor cycle of the victim. As a result, the victim sustained serious injuries all over his body and thereafter became disabled. On account of such injuries and the subsequent disablement, the claimant-injured filed application for compensation of Rs.
The extent of compensation awarded in a motor accident claim depends on various factors, including the claimant's income, the extent of disability, medical expenses, future prospects, and non-pecunia....
In cases of permanent disability due to motor accidents, courts must consider proven income, future prospects, and the severity of injuries when determining compensation.
The court confirmed that compensation in personal injury cases must be justly reflective of actual earnings and the impact of disability, not based on inflated assumptions.
The main legal point established is that the assessment of compensation in motor accident cases should consider the impact of permanent disability on the claimant's earning capacity, and the percenta....
The court established that future prospects and non-pecuniary damages must be considered in compensation calculations for permanent disability under the Motor Vehicles Act.
The court ruled that disability assessment by an expert doctor should be accepted in the absence of contrary evidence. It also clarified that compensation cannot be enhanced without a cross-objection....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
