IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.
Re : Bells Control Limited
IA NO. CA/12/2022 In CP/808/2016, IA NO. CA/5/2018 (Old No: CA/166/2018) In CP/808/2016, IA NO. CA/6/2018 (Old No: CA/168/2018) In CP/808/2016, IA NO. CA/11/2020 In CP/808/2016
Decided on : 12-03-2024
Transfer - Winding up proceedings - Companies Act, 2013, Section 434
Fact of the Case:
The applicant sought transfer of winding up proceedings to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) citing amended provisions of section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Finding of the Court:
The Court allowed the transfer, emphasizing that the NCLT should deal with the proceedings from the post admission stage of liquidation.
Issues: Transfer of winding up proceedings, jurisdiction of NCLT, progress in liquidation proceedings, and validity of leases and creditor claims.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the NCLT should handle the proceedings from the post admission stage of liquidation, rejecting the plea to re-examine the viability of the opinion given by the BIFR.
Final Decision: The winding up proceedings and connected applications were transferred to the NCLT, and the Department was directed to treat the case as disposed of insofar as the records of the Court are concerned.
JUDGMENT :
Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.
1. CA/12/2022 is an application for transfer of the winding up proceedings being CP/808/2016 to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).
2. It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that in view of the amended provisions of section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013, the winding up proceedings alongwith all connected applications cannot be proceeded with any further before this Court and should be transferred to the NCLT.
3. Section 434 of the Act as amended is as follows:-
(a) all matters, proceedings or cases pending before the Board of Company Law Administration (herein in this section referred to as the Company Law Board) constituted under sub-section (1) of Section 10-E of the Companies Act, 1956, immediately before such date shall stand transferred to the Tribunal and the Tribunal shall dispose of such matters, proceedings or cases in accordance with the provisions of this Act;
(b) any person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Company Law Board made before such date may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the decision or order of the Company Law Board to him on any question of law arising out of such order:
Provided that the High Court may if it is satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from filing an appeal within the said period, allow it to be filed within a further period not exceeding sixty days; and
(c) all proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956, including proceedings relating to arbitration, compromise, arrangements and reconstruction and winding up of companies, pending immediately before such date before any District Court or High Court, shall stand transferred to the Tribunal and the Tribunal may proceed to deal with such proceedings from the stage before their transfer:
Provided that only such proceedings relating to the winding up of companies shall be transferred to the Tribunal that are at a stage as may be prescribed by the Central Government:
[Provided further that only such proceedings relating to cases other than winding up, for which orders for allowing or otherwise of the proceedings are not reserved by the High Courts shall be transferred to the Tribunal:
[Provided also that—]
(i) all proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956 other than the cases relating to winding up of companies that are reserved for orders for allowing or otherwise such proceedings; or
(ii) the proceedings relating to winding up of companies which have not been transferred from the High Courts;
shall be dealt with in accordance with provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959:]
[Provided also that proceedings relating to cases of voluntary winding up of a company where notice of the resolution by advertisement has been given under sub-section (1) of Section 485 of the Companies Act, 1956 but the company has not been dissolved before the 1st April, 2017 shall continue to be dealt with in accordance with provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959:]
[Provided further that any party or parties to any proceedings relating to the winding up of companies pending before any Court immediately before the commencement of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Ordinance, 2018, may file an application for transfer of such proceedings and the Court may by order transfer such proceedings to the Tribunal and the proceedings so transferred shall be dealt with by the Tribunal as an application for initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (31 of 2016).]
(2) The Central Government may make rules consistent with the provisions of this Act to ensure timely transfer of all matters, proceedings or cases pending before the Company Law Board or the courts, to the Tribunal under this section].
The NCLT should handle winding up proceedings from the post admission stage of liquidation as per the amended provisions of section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the obligation to transfer winding-up proceedings to the NCLT in the absence of irreversible or exceptional circumstances, as per the amended Secti....
The discretion to transfer winding up proceedings to NCLT under Section 434(1)(c) of the Companies Act must prioritize potential corporate revival, and no irreversible actions should have occurred.
A winding-up petition can be transferred to the NCLT without a formal application if no irreversible steps have been taken in the liquidation process.
The main legal principle established in the judgment is that the discretion to transfer winding up proceedings to the tribunal should be based on the facts and circumstances of each case, considering....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the compulsory transfer of winding up proceedings to the NCLT in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and the decision of the ....
The irreversible steps taken for winding up of a company, including the sale of assets and insufficiency of assets to meet liabilities, justify the decision to reject the transfer of winding up proce....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.