HARISH TANDON, MADHURESH PRASAD
Samrat Samanta – Appellant
Versus
Somesh Dhara – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Harish Tandon, J.
1. There has been a slew of litigations between the parties to the present suit or their predecessors in relation to the properties being the subject matter of the instant suit claiming undivided right, title and interest therein and/or on the strength of the probate granted to the Will of the original owner namely Bidhubhusan Samanta.
2. The instant appeal arises from an order disposing of an application for temporary injunction holding that the plaintiff/respondent have made out a prima facie case and the balance of convenience and inconvenience lies in their favour and in the event the injunction is not granted they would suffer irreparable loss and injury.
3. The salient facts involved in the instant appeal are required to be adumbrated before we embark upon the legality and/or infirmity of the impugned order passed by the Trial Court. Admittedly, Bidhubhusan Samanta was the owner of the property described in the plaint of the instant proceeding and made and published his last Will on 11.10.1958 and got the same duly registered with the sub-Registry Office. By virtue of the said Will, the said testator, the Bidhubhusan Samanta, bequeathed his 1/4th shar
Bhargavi Construction & Anr. vs. Kothakapu Muthyam Reddy &Ors. reported in (2018) 13 SCC 480
Kishan Rao & Anr. Vs. Bidar District Legal Services Authority & Ors. reported in AIR 2001 Kar 407
State of Punjab & Ors. vs. Shri Ganpat Raj
State of Punjab & Anr. vs. Jalour Singh & Ors. reported in (2008) 2 SCC 660
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.