IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
T.S Sivagnanam, Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, JJ.
Chief Electrical Inspector, West Bengal, Directorate of Electricity, Government of West Bengal – Appellant
Versus
Arabinda Nath Jati & Ors. – Respondents
F.M.A. 20 of 2024 With I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2023
Decided On : 15-04-2024
Provisions of West Bengal Lifts, Escalators and Travelators Act, 2019 - Applicability to Home Lifts - Court held that the provisions of the said Act are not applicable to home lifts.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant, Chief Electrical Inspector of West Bengal, appealed against the order allowing the writ petition filed by the 1st respondent, setting aside the appellant's order. The appellant sought to challenge the finding that the provisions of the West Bengal Lifts, Escalators and Travelators Act, 2019 are not applicable to home lifts.
Finding of the Court:
The learned Single Bench found that the provisions of the said Act are not applicable to home lifts and also noted the appellant's failure to appear or represent himself in the writ petition. The court disposed of the appeal, allowing the appellant to file a review and seek a review of the imposed cost.
Issues: Applicability of the provisions of the West Bengal Lifts, Escalators and Travelators Act, 2019 to home lifts, failure of the appellant to appear in the writ petition, and the proper course of action for challenging the order.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the provisions of the said Act are not applicable to home lifts and allowed the appellant to file a review to challenge the finding.
Final Decision: The appeal and the connected application were disposed of, allowing the appellant to file a review and seek a review of the imposed cost. No costs were awarded.
JUDGMENT :
1. The appellant is the Chief Electrical Inspector of West Bengal and this appeal is directed against the order dated 17th April, 2023 by which the writ petition filed by the 1st respondent was allowed by setting aside the order passed by the Chief Electrical Inspector dated 20th December, 2022.
2. The learned Single Bench has recorded that the appellant, in spite of service of notice, did not care to appear or represent himself in the writ petition at the relevant point of time. The learned Single Bench also held that the provisions of the West Bengal Lifts, Escalators and Travelators Act, 2019 (for brevity ‘the said Act’) is not applicable to home lifts.
3. In this appeal, the appellant seeks to canvass the legal issue that the provisions of the said Act will also be applicable to home lifts and the finding rendered by the learned Single Bench may not be right. The appellant seeks to test the correctness of the impugned order on the grounds, which were never placed before the learned Single Bench. If according to the appellant, the provisions of the said Act would apply to home lifts as well, the proper course to be adopted was to file a review before the learned Single Bench and not to challenge the order by way of an intra-Court appeal on grounds, which were never placed before the learned Single Bench.
4. The learned advocate for the appellant submitted that a cost of Rs. 50,000/-has been imposed.
5. In the light of the above, the appeal and the connected application stand disposed of by giving liberty to the appellant to file a review canvassing all points of law and facts and also simultaneously seek for review of the order passed imposing cost.
6. If the review application is filed, the learned Single Bench is requested to consider the same and dispose it of in accordance with law.
7. The learned advocate appearing for the private respondents submitted that another appeal filed before this Court against the very same order in M.A.T. 746 of 2023 was disposed of by making certain observations.
The order passed in M.A.T. 746 of 2023 dated 6th July, 2023 be also taken note of by the learned Single Bench as and when the review application is filed.
8. No costs.
9. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished to the parties expeditiously upon compliance of all legal formalities.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the applicability of the provisions of the West Bengal Lifts, Escalators and Travelators Act, 2019 to home lifts.
(1) Orders dt. 19.03.2014 and 03.11.2015 cannot be interpreted to be applicable in rem,(2) Enlarging scope of benefit of Orders dt. 19.03.2014 and 03.11.2015 from 66 Apartment Owners to remaining 274....
The decision falls under Rule 3(2) of the Works of Licensees Rules, 2006 and relegates the petitioner to the alternative remedy available under the Rules.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.