SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Cal) 264

AJAY KUMAR GUPTA
Sandip Kumar Rit – Appellant
Versus
Soma Rit – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

AJAY KUMAR GUPTA, J.

1. Nobody appears on behalf of either of the parties on call.

2. This instant revisional application under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed by the petitioner/husband challenging the correctness, legality and propriety of order dated 11.8.2017 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in connection with Misc. Case No. 265 of 2017, thereby the learned Magistrate directed the petitioner to pay interim maintenance to the tune of Rs. 8,000/- per month to his wife and a sum of Rs. 7,000/- per month to his unmarried daughter.

3. The relevant facts are necessary for the purpose of disposal of this case as under:

    (a) The opposite party is a legally married wife of the petitioner and their marriage was solemnised at Durgapur on 26.02.2000 according to Hindu Rites and Customs. Subsequently, the said marriage was registered under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Out of said wedlock, one girl child was born on 16.12.2000. It is alleged by the opposite party/wife that at the time of marriage, the father of the opposite party gave 20 bhoris of gold ornaments and other household articles like air-condi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top