AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE
Kolkata Municipal Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Kusum Nahata – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.
1. Aforesaid four applications have been preferred against fixation of annual valuation in respect of different flats at premises no. 36 B, Panditya Road in word no. 85, Kolkata -29 for the period w.e.f. 4th Quarter 2014 2015. Due to commonality of issues involved in all the four applications they are heard together and are governed by this common order.
2. For better understanding a short description about the cases are given below:-
| Case Number (1) | MAA Appeal No. (2) | Date of order (3) | Flat no. & period of Assessment (4) | Annual valuation fixed by Hearing Officer (5) | Annual Valuation fixed by the Ld. Tribunal (6) |
| i).C.O. 130 of 2021 KMC Vs. Kusum Nahata & other | i).MAA No. 1276 of 2015. | i).13th December, 2018 | i).Flat Measuring covered area of 2356 Sq. ft. servants room and 200 Sq.ft. two open car parking space. 4th Quarter 2014-2015 | i).98,790/-
| i).40,500/- |
| ii). C.O. 136 of 2021 KMC Vs. Bandana Dhurka | ii).MAA No. 1277 of 2015 | ii). 1st March, 2019 | ii). Flat measuring covered area of 1056 sq.ft., 374 sq. ft. common area, one servant quarter measuring 60 sq.ft. one covered car parking space of 100 | ||
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.