JUDGMENT :

BIBHAS RANJAN DE, J.

1. Both the revision applications are taken up together for disposal via this common judgment on account of identical issue involved in both the cases initially put into motion by Aneesha Asfer who is the common opposite party (O.P. No. 2) in both the revision applications.

Brief facts:

CRR No. 372 of 2016

2. Petitioners no. 1, 2 & 6 are the sister-in-laws of the opposite party no. 2 herein. Petitioner no. 3 is the husband of petitioner no. 2 and petitioner no. 5 is the husband of petitioner no. 6. Petitioner no. 4 is the son of the uncle-in-law of the opposite party no. 2. The full blood brother of the petitioners no. 1, 2 & 6 namely Afser Shamim married the opposite party no. 2 herein and started residing along with his mother Ishrat Akhter (petitioner no. 1 of CRR 388 of 2016). It has been alleged that since after marriage the opposite party no. 2 in collusion with her husband started torturing the said Ishrat Akhter (petitioner no. 1 of CRR 388 of 2016) in every possible manner both physically and mentally in order to acquire the ancestral property. Such torture reached its saturation point on 20.01.2013 when she was viciously assaulted by the opposit