SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Cal) 749

JAY SENGUPTA, MD. NIZAMUDDIN
Tankeshwar Das – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Alokesh Sarkar
For the Respondent: Ms. A. S. Zinu

JUDGMENT :

JAY SENGUPTA. J.

1. This appeal is directed against a judgment and order of the conviction and sentence dated 20.01.2022 passed by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Judge, Special Court (POCSO Act), Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Port Blair in Special Case No. 27 of 2018 : Special Trial No. 10 of 2019, thereby convicting the appellant under section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) and sentencing him to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rupees Two Lakhs and to suffer rigorous imprisonment for ten (10) years with a fine of Rupees Ten Thousand for committing the offence punishable under section 315 of the Indian Penal Code, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months. If the fine was paid by the convict, the same was to be paid to the victim girl/survivor to meet her medical expenses and rehabilitation. By the same order, the co-accused/wife of the appellant was acquitted of all charges. The Administration was also advised to pay Rupees Ten Lakhs as compensation.

2. At this stage, it is submitted on behalf of the State that the girl is presently staying at an Ashram and the fine amount paid has alre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top