SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Cal) 779

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
JAY SENGUPTA, J.
Enforcement Directorate – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondents
WPA 802 of 2024 With IA No. CAN/1/2024
Decided on : 17-01-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. S.V. Raju, Mr. Dhiraj Trivedi ld. DSGI., Ms. Debjani Ray, Mr. Samrat Goswami. Ms. Sohini Dey
For the Respondent: Mr. Kishore Dutta ld. AG, Mr. Amitesh Banerjee ld. SSC, Ms. Ipsita Banerjee, Mr. Debangsu Dinda, Mr. Billwadal Bhattacharyya ld. DSGI, Mr. Amajit De, Mr. Biswarup Mukherjee

The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for a fair and effective investigation, leading to the direction of a Special Investigation Team consisting of personnel from both the CBI and the State police to investigate the alleged offences.

Headnote:

Transfer of Investigation - Enforcement Directorate - PML Act, Penal Code - The court discussed the need for transfer of investigation from State police to CBI due to serious flaws in the investigation conducted by the State police, including deliberate omissions of serious charges and lack of impartiality. The court directed a Special Investigation Team consisting of personnel from both the CBI and the State police to investigate the alleged offences.

Fact of the Case:

A group of officials of the Enforcement Directorate investigating offences under the PML Act were surrounded by an armed mob, attacked, robbed, and forced to leave the intended places of search. The State police's investigation was marred by serious flaws and bias.

Finding of the Court:

The court found serious flaws in the State police's investigation, including deliberate omissions of serious charges, lack of impartiality, and inability to handle the matter effectively. The court directed a Special Investigation Team consisting of personnel from both the CBI and the State police to investigate the alleged offences.

Issues: Transfer of investigation from State police to CBI, flaws in State police's investigation, bias and ineptitude of the local police, need for a fair and effective investigation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the serious flaws in the State police's investigation, including deliberate omissions of serious charges, lack of impartiality, and inability to handle the matter effectively. The court emphasized the need for a fair and effective investigation and directed a Special Investigation Team consisting of personnel from both the CBI and the State police to investigate the alleged offences.

Final Decision: The court directed a Special Investigation Team consisting of personnel from both the CBI and the State police to investigate the alleged offences. The Special Investigation Team shall be headed by an officer of the CBI and shall not report to the State or the Centre, but to the jurisdictional Magistrate. The court shall monitor the investigation.

JUDGMENT :

Jay Sengupta, J.

1. This is an application, inter alia, praying for transfer of investigation in Nazat Police Station Case No. 9 of 2024 and Bongaon Police Station Case No. 18 of 2024 from the State police to the Central Bureau of Investigation.

The connected application seeks similar transfer of investigation in Nazat Police Station Case No. 8 of 2024.

2. Learned Additional Solicitor General of India representing the petitioner/Enforcement Directorate submits as follows. The Enforcement Directorate was investigating a money laundering case involving the infamous Public Distribution System Scam. A Cabinet Minister of the State was arrested in it. Money trail was found in respect of two other significant political figures of the State owing allegiance to the ruling political party. They were Shankar Adhya and Sajahan Sheikh. On 05.01.2024 in the morning, the Enforcement Directorate held raids at the residence of the said Sajahan Sk. in order to search and seize relevant documents. The said suspect did not open the door despite being contacted over phone. Thereafter, his phone became busy. Later on, it was found from the tower location analysis of mobile phone that the suspect was in all probability inside his residence or very near. He called up his followers, the local miscreants to come and frustrate the raid. Some people even came in buses. About 1000 to 3000 people gathered being armed with sticks, bricks and stones. They attacked the raiding party members and the accompanying personnel of the CRPF. They did not even spare media persons present. Three E.D. Officials were seriously injured and had to be hospitalised. In collusion with the miscreants, a false FIR was registered as the first one being FIR No. 7 of 2024. A much watered down version was given in the suo moto FIR of the police being FIR No. 8. It is evident from the records that although the GD entry for the FIR No. 8 preceded the GD entry for the FIR No. 7, yet the counter version, evidently a false one, given by the caretaker of the accused was treated as the first FIR. There are interpolations in the same in adding a charge of outraging modesty of females. The proceeding in respect of the purported first FIR has been stayed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court upon making scathing observations. Even in the FIR No. 9 of 2024 filed by the Enforcement Directorate Official, the more serious Sections alleged were not included. Subsequently, only a charge of Section 325 of the Penal Code was added. Charges of attempt to murder, grievous hurt by dangerous means and dacoity were deliberately omitted. In the instant case, belongings of the E.D. Officers like laptops, wallets and other documents had also been looted away. The police did not arrest anyone from the spot. Till date, out of so many accused miscreants, only seven have been arrested. The prime accused is a very influential political leader and a local maffia. The predicate offences and the PML Act case involves a Minister in the State Cabinet. Therefore, it is an appropriate case which should be transferred to the CBI. In Vinit Narayan, (1998) 1 SCC 226, the Hon’ble Apex Court has stipulated certain conditions so that the CBI could remain neutral. Upon inquiry, it is submitted that the predicate offences are still investigated by the State police. On the hand, the State police is trying to have access to the investigation that is being done by the Enforcement Directorate in the garb of investigating the present case. The recent praying for adding certain graver sections to the case is only a ploy to retain investigation. At this stage, no submission is advanced in respect of Bongaon P.S. Case No. 18 of 2024.

3. Learned Advocate General representing the State submits as follows. At present the local police is investigating the instant case, however, under the supervision of the SDPO, the DSP and the Circle Inspector. Till date seven persons have been arrested. Sections 325, 337 and 189 of the Penal Code

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top