IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
AJAY KUMAR GUPTA, J.
Sisir Kumar Mahato – Petitioner
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Anr. – Respondents
C.R.R. 574 of 2022
Decided On : 19-02-2024
Juvenile Justice Board - Criminal Procedure - Indian Penal Code - Sections 217/221/222/223/225A/225B/119/174/177 - The court discussed the judgment and order passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, the non-compliance of the order by the District Child Protection Officer, and the filing of a charge sheet against the petitioner under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. The key legal provisions discussed include the duties of the District Child Protection Officer, non-compliance with court orders, and the nature of criminal offences.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a District Child Protection Officer, was alleged to have not complied with the judgment and order passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, resulting in the filing of a charge sheet against him under various sections of the Indian Penal Code.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that there were sufficient grounds to proceed with the case against the petitioner, as the non-compliance with the court order and the evidence collected during the investigation established a prima facie case against the petitioner.
Issues: The main issues revolved around the non-compliance of the court order by the District Child Protection Officer and the filing of a charge sheet against the petitioner under various sections of the Indian Penal Code.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that there were sufficient grounds to proceed with the case against the petitioner based on the non-compliance with the court order and the evidence collected during the investigation.
Final Decision: The Criminal Revisional Application was dismissed, and the court ordered the return of the case diary. The interim order was vacated, and a copy of the judgment and order was to be sent to the learned Court below for information.
JUDGMENT :
Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.
1. This Criminal Revisional Application has been filed by the petitioner under Sections 397/401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of the proceeding of G.R. Case No. 891/2021 arising out of Purulia (Town) Police Station Case No. 108/2021 dated 25th June, 2021 under Sections 217/221/222/223/225A/225B/119/174/177 of the Indian Penal Code and the order dated 08.12.2021 passed by the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purulia.
2. The brief facts are relevant for the purpose of disposal of this case as under:
On 25th June, 2021, Learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, District-Purulia lodged an FIR alleging that the petitioner did not comply with the judgment and order passed by the Juvenile Justice Board. A juvenile in conflict with law (JCL) found guilty and was directed to undergo community service under the direct supervision of the District Child Protection Officer (DCPO), Purulia for 3 years from the expiry of the date of appeal period in connection with a proceeding being JGR Case No. 27/2011 arising out of Purulia (M) Police Station Case No. 121/2011 dated 12.07.2011 under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner did not follow the said order and neither filed report regarding complying such order nor had the juvenile undertaken community service. The contents of the FIR are set forth inter alia as hereunder: -
There cannot be any disqualification on a juvenile in conflict with law.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the determination of the accused's juvenile status at the time of the alleged offence and the subsequent transfer of the case to the Juvenile Ju....
Procedure provided under Sections 15 and 19 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 has been held to be mandatory.
The Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, prohibits stigma against juveniles in conflict with the law, emphasizing the protection and rehabilitation of juveniles, and the prohibition of stigma even in cases of....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the original complainant did not have the locus standi to file an application for conducting the trial of the juvenile applicant as an adult, ....
The determination of juvenility in cases involving children in conflict with law must be conducted by the Juvenile Justice Board, and any contrary determination by a Magistrate is without jurisdictio....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for compliance with the statutory provisions of Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. and the proper procedure for handling juveniles in con....
Juveniles in conflict with law cannot face disqualification in future employment opportunities due to prior convictions as per Section 24 of the JJ Act, 2015.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.